On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 19:59, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
>
> > I am interested in finding out what the motivation is for requiring
> > valid reverse address lookups before connecting to a daemon. I have
> > heard a number o
justification for this practice? In my opinion it does not appear to
increase the validity of the connection. But I may be missing something
obvious.
Thanks in advance...
--dfc returns to lurk mode
Douglas F. Calvert
see in rag
magazine reports has to do with how the budgets are handled. If you can
budget a multi-billion dollar organization and put in reasonable price
and performance controls there are many schools that would hire you
after you revolutionized public administration and the DoD...
--
Douglas
Hello,
Will there be a key signing? And can non attendees attend the key
signing?
--
+ Douglas Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://anize.org/dfc +
|Key Id 0xC9541FB2 http://anize.org/dfc-keys.asc|
| http://imissjerry.org http://whoownsthisidea.org |
+-| 0817 30D4 82B6 BB8D 5E66
Hello,
Are the pgp key signings a regular feature of nanog meetings now? And
if so can I come up for the signing in toronto if I am not going to
attend the conference? Thanks..
BTW
Thanks to everyone who helped me with the port usage statistics...
--
+---+
Hello,
My name is Douglas Calvert, I am a graduate student at Syracuse
university, and a research assitant for the Center for Systems Assurance
(www.csa.syr.edu). I have been a lurker on this list for quite some time
and I would like to apologize for this non-operational content. i
recognize that
