in
the cars.
-30-
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
d by default.
Wouldn't it make more sense to ship with all of the services disabled?
I mean, if the role of the firewall is to block packets to weak services,
wouldn't it be simpler to just disable the damn services since they aren't
going to be usabl
These costs
also have secondary effects, like permanently delaying rate reductions
(sorry your tuition went up again, but we had to buy another cluster),
which in turn affects other parties, but the bulk of the pressure is
wherever the mailstore is at.
--
Eric A. Hall
ort. And folks
like Berman (the RIAA vigilante bill) and Feinstein (the MPAA) are
Democrats. And you misused "licentious".
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954591.html shows that this kind of effort
has been going for a while.
--
Eric A. Hallhttp:/
used for tasks
like ~find the mail server, but nobody should seriously argue that we
should use DNS to hold ~RFC822/MIME messages and entities.
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
level event in Silicon
Valley. But the board instead will release a draft of the strategy and
will go back to private industry and public sector experts to seek more
suggestions for the final plan, according to sources.
[...]
--
Eric A. Hallhttp:
e just to throw us off the truth!
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/08/08/020808hnftcboost2.xml
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,449416,00.asp
investigation started in this term, action concluded in this term
please... somewhere else, thanks
--
Eri
pes
|
| Other "multipart" subtypes are expected in the future. MIME
| implementations must in general treat unrecognized subtypes of
| "multipart" as being equivalent to "multipart/mixed".
A mailer which displays the embedded text as attachments is
lems with your own
mailer is pretty dumb.
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
ISPs don't offer it, firewalls/NATs don't support it, and
so forth. I've never had a network connection which supported it.
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I mean, is it *that* hard to avoid lame delegations and typos in
> the SOA or NS records?
apparently
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
wouldn't need funding. MAPS could make a
decent income by filing class-action suits against spammers, for example.
No reason for the government to get involved other than holding court.
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols
it is even less likely to succeed,
since there isn't anybody with a financial incentive to make sure that it
works and to drive the necessary adoptions. A micropayment option with a
big backer at least has the chance to do things like pay email developers
to add su
Hey! Where's my reply? I'm in the hole $.04 on this thread now!
Right! No more mail to you until you send me two messages!
Then we all move to some other medium that doesn't cost money -- and then
the spammers follow us there too.
"Eric A. Hall" wrote:
>
&g
"Forrest W. Christian" wrote:
> Grandma would get 2c for each mail she received. Grandma would pay 2c
> for each email she sent. Where does that cause the problems you are
> talking about?
I send a lot more mail than grandma does.
--
Eric A. Hall
ropayments won't be needed if the right laws are passed. Given the
history, the biggest problem with the legal approach is that congress will
pass a bad law instead of the one they need to, which is to extend the
TCPA to include spam.
--
Eric A. Hallh
c" {
match-clients {
any;
};
zone...
};
Internal and external have their own views of sensitive zones, but they
share the root cache and other public zones.
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
