Earlier today I had an issue where a circuit to one of my two BGP
connected upstreams went away for an hour or so.
During this period, I expected BGP to act as expected and migrate the
traffic to the second circuit with a second provider. This did not
occur. Initially I figured this had
Randy Epstein wrote:
I don't have an answer to the root cause of your problem, and I'm not
looking for a discussion on route dampening (there are enough debates
onthis issue to make your head spin), but may I suggest you raise your
hold timers to prevent your BGP sessions from going down on
Two somewhat intertwined questions. I'll ask the second part first.
I buy transit from Global Crossing and another carrier on HDLC
encapsulated DS3's.
Recently my BGP session has started flapping on the GX circuit... It
looks something like this:
Jul 21 21:17:43.731 UTC:
After a routing issue between us and an instance of the RFC1918 anycast
servers blackhole-[12].iana.org which caused all sorts of bizzare failures
within customer networks, I'm trying to figure out if there is a really
good reason why I shouldn't keep a copy of the 1918 zones on my local
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Bob Martin wrote:
I didn't know this was possible. I thought there was a 1 to 1
relationship with nameserver names/addresses. I'm trying to figure out
if this is or will be a problem.
Paul Vixie can probably better address this than myself, but I will
mention that with
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Drew Weaver wrote:
It is generally the responsibility of the ISP to provide the outgoing
mail transport for your connected users.
This BCP seems to be changing. The new BCP which seems to be evolving
requires customers to authenticate to their home mail server on the MSA
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Christopher Woodfield wrote:
OK, from my reading in Newton's Telecom Dictionary, it appears that NIU
is a generic term for whatever the customer plugs their cable into,
be it a powered or a dumb device. Mea culpa.
...
...installed on the premises as a semi-intelligent
at least 256MB.
If you are using something else, YMMV - it all depends on how efficient
the software is at storing it in memory.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
--
The Innovation Machine Ltd
visible address on
each of my 100 computers in my Beowulf cluster of 486's are the types of
things we don't waive the fees for even though they are valid enough
reasons to hand out a block of address space for.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
boundary.
My guess of the real underlying reason is that saying I need a full class
C or I need a block of [4,8,16,32,64] addresses seems to be a lot
easier to say in a clear fashion over the phone or in person than I need
a slash-twentyfour.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
to fix the
broken sites. YMMV
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
--
The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749
http://www.imach.com/Helena, MT 59604
Home
as it is cheaper to buy
circuits from sprint or similar to their internet PoPs than it is to buy
circuits around the state. In most cases we will still be maintaining
internal connectivity for backup and latency reasons.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
--
The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749
http://www.imach.com/Helena, MT 59604
Home of PacketFlux Technogies
the sender to take some action (respond with a
password, click on a URL, etc.) before the mail gets through. One of
these days I hope to write the procmail rules to do it (if I don't find
someone that has done it already)
Tagged Message Delivery Agent.
http://software.libertine.org/tmda/
- Forrest W
That will be x cents please, at
which point the server sends some sort of cert-signed digital cash.
I'm not sure how you would bootstrap this or if it will ever be possible.
I just think that if we could get even $0.02 per email from the spammers a
lot of them would stop.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
What I envision is some sort of micropayment protocol extension to SNMP.
-
Make that SMTP :) I guess I've been working on network monitoring too
much recently
% of the spam is driven by greed, and if we can't
satisfy the greed of the spammers, they will go elsewhere.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
--
The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749
I want to clarify this a bit, before I get flamed (not that I'm not going
to anyways).
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
The people in the middle would get *nothing* beyond what they are getting
today.
Grandma would get 2c for each mail she received. Grandma would pay 2c
and putting on filters don't work. Depending on each mail
server admin to do the right thing doesn't work. We need to find
something else that will.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
-- The
Innovation Machine Ltd
of CPU
cycles. In fact, I'm thinking this is probably a better solution than the
pay-per-message solution, as we don't have to worry about settlement, etc.
etc. which was the real problem with the pay-per-message.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Lionel wrote:
telnet bofh.engr.wisc.edu 666
Folks, please don't try to connect to that service.
Posting it here seems to have Slashdotted it.
Works fine here
Are you sure you haven't got uunet between you and it? ;-)
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED
know that bind9 has added functionality similar to what you are
looking for. I'm a bind fan myself.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
--
The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749
http
to fix a router.
As a final insult, Qwest is trying to convince the FCC to give them LATA
relief (which would be a mixed blessing for us), because they are getting
beat up by the competition. I say, show me ANYONE who is competing with
you and we'll switch tomorrow.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL
or traceroute from the provider we're
having problems reaching.
- Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
--
The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749
http://www.imach.com
. Christian wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:10:18 + (GMT)
From: Forrest W. Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: batz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark E. Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with bad announcement from UUnet
I've
25 matches
Mail list logo
