Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd)

2003-10-28 Thread Henry Linneweh
I think if program design criterion would change, to coding secure applications then the problem would be reduced dramatically -HenryPetri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Kaufman wrote:End-to-end requires that people writing the software at the end learn aboutbuffer overruns (and other

RE: Rx and Tx on a single SMF strand for MANs?

2003-10-24 Thread Henry Linneweh
A bunch of optical ethernet guys make everything one would need from the enterprise to the metro area, GigE to dwdm to sonet/sdh http://www.luminous.com/ -HRLDeepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A bunch of guys make these in very simple configurations.MRV:

Re: data request on Sitefinder

2003-10-20 Thread Henry Linneweh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1 Oh boy, well first and foremost the root servers and database areowned by the public because they were paid for from the TAX-BASE. Second and foremost the technology to redirect web pages and ips isnot new or innovative, kiddies used to do it on

Re: VeriSign to Sell Network Solutions Business

2003-10-16 Thread Henry Linneweh
That is a positive note, hopefully the new group will give us a public statement of its intentions. -HenryMark Vallar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just got this email from Network Solutions...Hm--mvalFrom: Network Solutions, Inc.[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:31

Re: Verisign's public opinion play

2003-10-07 Thread Henry Linneweh
Innovation and the Internet http://news.com.com/2010-1071-5086769.html is about 12 hours old on google news -HenryBrian Bruns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I donno about anyone else, but I absolutely suck on the PR end ofthings.Now, I *am* good at writing documentation for end users (I used to

Re: VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting

2003-09-29 Thread Henry Linneweh
That is so not very funny, andafterthis latest move on verisigns part, Iwouldn't trust online voting forthe next 1000 years..and you can "quote" me on that... -Henry Eric Germann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hope they don't just wildcard the virtual hanging chads...They could start with a vote

Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings

2003-09-27 Thread Henry Linneweh
are there any better tools that will accmoplish the same thing for win2k/xp users -HenryPetri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William Caban wrote:Are NANOG meetings webcasted? More specifically, Is NANOG29 going to bewebcasted/multicasted/netcasted? NANOG meetings have typically very narrowband

Re: IP telephony

2003-09-16 Thread Henry Linneweh
http://www.luminous.com has ip telephony solutios that are secure read under products and request your own information -HenryChristopher Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There has been much buzz of late about using IP telephony solutions inplace of the more common analog based solutions.Traditional

Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS

2003-09-09 Thread Henry Linneweh
I used to help design these products and I veified them http://www.luminous.com/ -HenryAndy Walden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Gil Levi wrote: Can anyone help me convert a 100MB Ethernet interface to an OC-3 POS interface in a small cheap box ?Depends on what you mean by cheap?

Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows

2003-08-25 Thread Henry Linneweh
Microsoft has a task scheduler that people should learn to use to remind them to check update to make sure their patches are current, it is located in the control panel and labled Scheduled Tasks and has an Add Scheduled Tasks icon to add update, FYI -HenryJack Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Don't beat me, but i've noticed a huge influx of these .pif virii today.

2003-08-19 Thread Henry Linneweh
Now having personally experienced the worm myself. This is how it went, there was no known way to remove the worm with any current software for the variety that I had, it was mutagenic, recognized AVP, and other forms of disinfectors and went nuts propagating itself to the point the only

Re: Microsoft to ship new versions with firewall enabled

2003-08-14 Thread Henry Linneweh
It comes standard with a firewall built in, which is not user friendly and you have to still purchase a firewall that allows user access to control what gets blocked and what does not, most intelligent people turn it off. -HenryEdward Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Veering further

Re: RPC errors

2003-08-14 Thread Henry Linneweh
This should help some for people who are worried http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/FixBlast.exe -Henry"Steven M. Bellovin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dominic J. Eidson" writes:On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Jack Bates wrote: Sean Donelan wrote:

Re: testing bandwidth of big internet pipes

2003-08-14 Thread Henry Linneweh
This is almost comical when I read this, when I sit out here and see people getting whacked at 3Gb/s and from an estimated 2.3 million drones, sitting on various proxies and hacked .edu accounts. Where are the pages that have solutions for such intense attacks and if you don't want to say

Re: a list of hosts in a RPC BOTNET, mostly 209.x.x.x,

2003-08-06 Thread Henry Linneweh
When looking at IRC and chat networks in general you have to look at them from the internet since the attacks are launched from the internet outside of any irc. The originators of the attacks use irc as a front to distract the investigators effort to find their real points of origin. In the past

Re: Complaint of the week: Ebay abuse mail (slightly OT)

2003-08-04 Thread Henry Linneweh
Here is a company who thinks they have a solution for spam http://www.nwtechusa.com/ironmail-zd-srit-enterprise-security.html -Henry[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have though people would have learned by now that there is no technical solution to spam. You can go ahead with all these

Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions

2003-07-30 Thread Henry Linneweh
I agree with Pauls' position on anti-spoofing, without that, you are fighting A losing battle. Henry R LinnewehPaul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Filtering the bogons does help, and everyone should perform anti-spoofing in the appropriate places. It isn't, however, a silver bullet.it's

second call for an unbundled portable /24

2003-07-23 Thread Henry Linneweh
We have attempted in the past tried to deal with Arin on this issue and they as usual deny anything that could potentially be useful, in thwarting these attacks. There have been some people with good idea's, however when you have a 1 gig bi-directional pipe and you have 2Gb/s incoming these

Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability now in the news

2003-07-17 Thread Henry Linneweh
July 17, 2003DoS Flaw in Cisco Router, Switches By Ryan Naraine http://www.atnewyork.com/news/article.php/2236591

I need a portable /24 not attached to any sub-domain or anything else subject to attack

2003-07-15 Thread Henry Linneweh
I simply would like to borrow this /24 if you are not going to use in the near and distantfuture or ever for that matter. It can not be attached to any subdomain and or any or part of any routing table, this would most helpful in the development of methods to prevent ddos and dos. Thank you very

<    1   2