-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Hubbard
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:42 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: IP adresss management verification
What I meant was we require a technical justification to
give a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Gibbard
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 8:48 PM
To: Vandy Hamidi
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Vandy Hamidi wrote:
Below is how I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:22 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RFC 4041
Requirements for Morality Sections in Routing Area Drafts
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jared Mauch
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 7:06 PM
To: Paul Vixie
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:32:33PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Luke Parrish
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:29 AM
To: Pete Templin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: outage/maintenance window opinion
In this situation we were expecting to be done for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Bonomi
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 7:05 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors
Dunno where you got the 'more than 2 subscribers' bit as
defining
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sam Stickland
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Utilising upstream MED values
Hi,
We're looking at doing outbound traffic values based on
upstream (tier1)
