> From: Alexander Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[..]
> As another matter I do not believe in public peering at all
> when you have flows to a single peer that are ore than half
> of a full GE. Been there, was not at all nice. I guess more
> and more operators will have less and less public IX po
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Petach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 11:15 AM
To: Huopio Kauto
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Summary/minutes from sunday evening?
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:00:55 +0200, Huopio Kauto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
&
So..
Could someone please summarize the Sunday evening meeting? Minutes anyone?
--Kauto
Kauto Huopio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Security Adviser / CERT-FI -coordinator
Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority / CERT-FI
tel. +358-9-6966772, fax. +358-9-6966515
CERT-FI duty desk +358-9-69
Following documents are recommended reading:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/006489/h323.htm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040113-h323.shtml
--Kauto
Kauto Huopio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Security Adviser / CERT-FI -coordinator
Finnish Communications Regulatory Autho
It seems that Microsoft is Akamai'zing as we speak..
--Kauto
Kauto Huopio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Security Adviser / CERT-FI -coordinator
Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority / CERT-FI
tel. +358-9-6966772, fax. +358-9-6966515
CERT-FI duty desk +358-9-6966510 / http://www.cert.fi
from F-Secure is here:
http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/msblast.shtml
--Kauto
Kauto Huopio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Security Adviser / CERT-FI -coordinator
Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority / CERT-FI
tel. +358-9-6966772, fax. +358-9-6966515
CERT-FI duty desk +358-9-6966510 /
>> Perhaps someone could write a bcp for an email-form that lays out the
same
>> information so we can make the complaints use this format and all
abuse
>> departments can accept using this form, to get some structure to it?
>yow. i first asked that this be done in 1998, and for this very reas
In Finland, it is very usual that cell providers can bring a mini-cell
(_not_ a repeater, a real cell) _in_ to the building and wire all floors and
especially facilities that are below ground level. In my previous life, I
got
a cell provider to install an extension to the in-house antenna network
How about just plainly blocking the most obvious holes, that is
telnet and POP? If someone wants a direct telnet connection to a
route server or something similar - open a hole with a web-based tool?
Ok, then you say all unencrypted www traffic with plain username/pw..
SSH'ing everything back to
>> What is the legal position of an IRU deal if the cable owner goes belly
>> up?
>Unless someone buys the equipment and agrees to theke the IRU:s on - they
>are worthless.
How about duct IRU:s?
--kauto
>
>Does anyone know what happened to the Ebone/KPNQWEST European-wide DWDM
>system? I figure that if it was shut down, we would see more impact.
>
>Their IP network load I bet was quite easily handled by other operators
>considering the huge over-capacity situation we have had the past years.
Interesting how quietly one of the powerhouses in Europe has been shut
down yesterday evening. Any notes on increased latency / routing issues
wrt AS286 shutdown?
--kauto
Kauto Huopio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Security Adviser
Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority / CERT-FI
tel. +35
12 matches
Mail list logo