[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're currently receiving the following prefix from
TeliaSonera on one of our IP transit links in Oslo:
aut-num:AS29049
as-name:Delta-Telecom-AS
descr: Delta Telecom LTD.
descr: International Communication Operator
descr:
Whoops! I'm still coming to grips with multihoming. According to
your thinking, my many years on the NANOG mailing list were wrong and
you tell me I should leave.
I don't think I can allow you to do that, Andrew.
Paul Vixie, Dillon, Bush, and others have given many examples of
, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On phone networks, flat rate kinda works because a single phone
call is a very tiny fraction of the shared resource.
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but I bet it's still
around in at
least a few places.
If you're seriously considering using these addresses, these are other
possible issue you need to consider.
DS
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Following up on the thread about BGP communities, I was wondering if
there is a guide on how to actually implement communities within a
network...
There are a couple of presentations about why communities are good and
about the general design of communities but my googlefu has so far not
Robert Baxter wrote:
This may be of use to you.
http://www.secsup.org/Tracking/
Thanks, should have been more specific, its more a case of being able to
give traffic engineering like the ones listed on
http://www.onesc.net/communities/
J
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W:
the source :/
I've put the MP3 (the best quality we've got, unfortunately... had we known
what to expect, we'd have increased the encoding quality a bit) up at
http://www.mcvax.org/~jhma/ripe55song.mp3.
Regards,
James
Sometimes it's much cheaper and easier to make people think that something
works
Joe Provo wrote:
A provider-hosted solution which
managed to transparently handle this across multiple clients and
trackers would likely be popular with the end users.
but not with the rights holders...
J
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W: http://www.enta.net/
L:
, or gear from vendors that no longer exist?
As long as this stuff generally works, nobody's likely to replace it.
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... a month including 25% sales tax
^^
and we are complaining about download quotas, ouch
--
James
Hex Star wrote:
Why is it that the US has ISP's with either no quotas or obscenely high
ones while countries like Australia have ISP's with ~12gb quotas? Is
there some kind of added cost running a non US ISP?
In the UK there is a very good reason - BT, see this write up:
get
a kick out of this one :)
james
liberty nor safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Our Internet service is in the toilet again!
Yes, that's where we installed it..
http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2196948/university-taps-sewers-internet
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W: http://www.enta.net/
L: http://tinyurl.com/3bxqez
/iason/
http://www.cesidianroot.com/
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wguisa71
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 11:31 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Network Inventory Tool
Guys,
Does anyone known some tool for network documentation with:
On 8/1/07, Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of our customers are co-location and dedicated hosting
customers and we are simply unsure whether or not there are implications
(legal or otherwise) in publishing our customer data in a public RIR
database.
I would urge against
be substantial.
At 7/24/2007 11:50 AM -0400, Chad Oleary wrote:
snip/
However, what I'm trying to understand is why the motivation to
rapidly go from v4 to v6 only? What are the factors I'm missing in
operating v4/v6 combined for some time?
Chad
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Barrett == Barrett Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Barrett Apparently GoDaddy does not support v6 glue for their customers,
Barrett who does?
I know that gkg.net does.
And entering them is via the same web form as v4 addresses.
-JimC
--
James Cloos [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP: 1024D
Hi all,
Sorry for the cross posting to a number of lists but this is an
important topic for many of you (especially if you get multiple copies).
As many people are aware there is an 'expectation' that 'consumer'
broadband providers introduce network level content blocking for
specified content
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
[trimmed other lists, not sure if they'd appreciate nanog volumes]
On 7-jun-2007, at 11:06, James Blessing wrote:
As many people are aware there is an 'expectation' that 'consumer'
broadband providers introduce network level content blocking for
specified
Joe Abley wrote:
Anyway, how does BT's cleanfeed work? How are British 3G operators doing
equivalent blocking? I'd be interested in learning about the
implementation.
There is an excellent paper on the failures of clean feed here:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf
J
--
COO
they say makes much sense and
avoids the semantic quibbling that has consumed too much of NANOG
mailing list bandwidth. We already know that All dragons are
scotsmen, but not all scotsmen are dragons.
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jo Rhett wrote:
We've long been aware that BT *never* deals with spammers or DoS attacks
that originate from their network, but a new issue has come to light.
BT has a number of users who are apparently testing out stolen credit
card numbers from their network against stores of all
Shai Balasingham wrote:
We recently started to assign these blocks. So all the ranges are not
assigned yet. Following are some...
99.245.135.129
99.246.224.1
99.244.192.1
All reachable from here (as8468)
J
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W: http://www.enta.net/
L:
, including all the headers. --
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]James R. Cutler
To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: Blocking mail from bad places
At 4/5/2007 08:38 AM -0700, Thomas Leavitt wrote:
One problem with the bounce solution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Ortega wrote:
I am a network engineer for Midcontinent Communications We are an ISP in
the American Midwest. Recently, we were allocated a new network
assignment: 96.2.0.0/16. We've been having major issues with sites still
blocking this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Voellmy wrote:
I'm trying to learn about BGP and just ran across RPSL. I've seen
www.radb.net http://www.radb.net and know that lots of people are
registering their policies here. Are organizations also using these RPSL
policies to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You misunderstand. The problem of securing machines *IS* solved. It is
possible. It is regularly done with servers connected to the Internet.
There is no *COMPUTING* problem or technical problem.
True *BUT* (and this is
MSN / Hotmail Email admin, please contact me off-list.
Thanks,
James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gristina wrote:
I have two racks in London UK. The colocation is
currently in London. The contract is up soon and most
of the feet on the ground in the UK of the company is
in the greater Birmingham area. So I'm interested in
colocating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on sending 0
prefixes across a BGP session?
J
- --
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
http://www.enta.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil J. McRae wrote:
are you advertising them routes?
If so then why wouldn't you expect traffic?
-Original Message-
Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on
sending 0
prefixes across a BGP session?
Anyone else getting a 403 Forbidden when trying to access http://
cisco.com?
James Baldwin
Looks like certain portions of it are coming back... that recursive
chown is taking a while.
James Baldwin
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:24 AM, James Baldwin wrote:
Anyone else getting a 403 Forbidden when trying to access http://
cisco.com?
James Baldwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward Lewis wrote:
Yeah, granted anyone looking for myspace might meet that demographic,
but how many neophytes would use Google for a IP Who Is search?
That's the listing I thought odd.
Having looked at the article isn't this a case of someone
.
Regards,
james
.
Regards,
james
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Lyons wrote:
Get the guys direct number and start calling him all day. Direct
marketers/debt collectors really hate it when you call them at work and
bug them.. :)
Or give them a premium rate number that they can call that goes to permanent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Levine wrote:
He told me he would still calling until he got through to the right
person. I am the right person.
Next time, try asking for the name and phone number of his boss, so
you can call and report what an excellent job he's doing.
as their network engineers
customers. :)
IMHO, of course.
Indeed, at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter these days :)
james
Doesn't appear to have affected many, if any, people on this list but
SunGard Austin experienced a partial power outage this morning. This
event began around 0530 CST and most power was restored by 0700 CST.
SunGard Austin is currently running without redundant UPS and does
not have an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
matthew zeier wrote:
Does it simply provide an easy way to privately connect to transit and
peers? Or can I also go crazy and peer with anyone who wants to peer
(like in the olden day!) ?
EU peering is very different from US peering (as many
I'm soliciting recommendations for DNS based load balancers.
Currently, we have Cisco Global Site Selectors deployed buy have
reached a limit for the number of active HTTP HEAD checks we can
perform. This lack of scalability is restricting us severely with
regards to the number of
but currently lacks IGP
support (though, openospfd is under works). Zebra is only stable when it's
doing nothing or next to nothing.
james
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:39:26AM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
Wired posted what are suppossedly the docs Mark Klein wrote 'bout the
NSA sniffing project. Interesting read...
http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/att_klein_wired.pdf
John
Indeed. To be honest, I am more interested in
: My address assignment can be seen by ...
whois baby-dragons
--
+--+
| James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give me VMS |
| NetworkEngineer | 3542 Broken Yoke Dr. | Give me Linux |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
, whatever it is.
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] for url to Cogent User Manual/Guide?
It's all documented there, just letting you know.
James
it you you again. Thanks!
Gadi.
It appears the quality of nanog mailing list is becoming on the par with
that of Full-Disclosure.
James
not be strictly
true when
considering VPN technologies.
Dave
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to peer or otherwise to gain access to their
content.
BellSouth is better off buying transit from Cogent and forget this
how do we make the most money off of our access network mantra ;)
James
settings and database backup utilities (both the
Administration Guide and the Command Reference came up short) over
its CLI. If you can suggest a more appropriate list to interrogate,
I'd also be appreciative.
---
James Baldwin
in IPv6, which worries me more. Shim6 and other proposals
are creative, but don't replace a lot of the functionality I'd be
losing. This is another story though, that is getting really off topic.
I agree.. but this opens up the whole Great Multihoming Debate ;
James
-Original Message-
From: David Raistrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:33 AM
To: James
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?)
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, James wrote:
There are already *several* sane
I send a message to my transits (Qwest and Global Crossing) and ATT. Here
is the message
I got back from ATT.
James,
We're looking into the situation. We'll get back with you shortly.
Regards,
Angie Eborn
ATT IP COE
(866) 397-7309, option 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From
I am seeing 171K routes from my transits and looks like this has been fixed.
James
Routing and Security Administrator
At the Santa Fe Office: Cyber Mesa Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM
peer migrates from Cisco to Juniper.
The only difference this time is that both ASes are operated by (different
groups within) the RIPE NCC.
James
in how machines
represent and execute code.
---
James Baldwin
Tolerance is for the insincere
Thank you. Best explanation of on-list unsubscribe I have
read.
Cutler
At 11/4/2005 04:24 PM -0800, Kyle Lutze wrote:
Ron Muir wrote:
unsubscribe
Here's how to unsubscribe:
snip/
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
s/64/128/
...and total, complete, non-sense. please educate yourself more on reality
of inet6 unicast forwarding before speculating. Thank you.
James
against them) tier-1 ISP - may be; are they high quality
ISP - in NO WAY (they just provide bandwidth to nowhere without any clue).
Non-sense.
James
- Original Message -
From: John Dupuy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Wednesday
]
Globalstar
Communications
(408) 933-4387
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey there,
I would run from the 7206+NPE-G1 in this
capacity. We have not had luck actually getting a gig worth of traffic flowing
through them. Great small site router, but not much on the throughput side at
all.
James
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Would love to see this report.
This was a pretty wide reaching event and it would be nice to know the
more detailed extent of the full event.
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris Malayter
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 12:21 PM
it extortion, some may call it
the depeeree deserved it or some may call it both sides burning bridges.
and other views, etc..
James
--
James Jun
Infrastructure and Technology Services
TowardEX Technologies
Office +1-617-459-4051 x179 | Mobile +1-978-394-2867
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.towardex.com
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:23:44PM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote:
And after November 9, what is then? Cogent/L3 depeering part 2?
Part III: Level3 Strikes Back :)
Depeering World Series now at:
Level3: 2, Cogent: 14
--
James Jun
Infrastructure and Technology Services
TowardEX
.
J. Oquendo
--
James
] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James
for or
otherwise being purchased for :)
James
--
James Jun
Infrastructure and Technology Services
TowardEX Technologies
Office +1-617-459-4051 x179 | Mobile +1-978-394-2867
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.towardex.com
they run the risk of being de-peered by others. A few low yield,
short term customers crying about rebates, could in comparison be
quite insignificant.
jc
--
James
in the next year or two perhaps. If multihoming
solutions don't really turn out well and v6 is appearing to become more
ubiquitous, it may be a plausible idea to start opening up your route-filters
to accept /48 prefix-lengths before the first depeering happens :)
James
--
James Jun
On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:52 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
before wielding your hyper-platinum amex card.
I believe what you're actually referring to is the black american
express centurion card.
---
James Baldwin
DNS
(physically separate NS's, multiple DNS servers, power, etc.) and I
won't brook no spammers. Not from my .jt ccTLD!
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of later collision,
and isn't on topic here.
brandon
-
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. The number of
customers
gets more.
Kind regards,
Peter and Karin Dambier
--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Public-Root
Graeffstrasse 14
D-64646 Heppenheim
+49-6252-671788 (Telekom)
+49-179-108-3978 (O2 Genion)
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://iason.site.voila.fr
http://www.kokoom.com/iason
-
James R
should approach ICANN
with alternate proposals.
Regards.
Cutler
At 9/27/2005 11:46 PM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
Hi James,
James R. Cutler wrote:
Peter,
I must have missed something here.
Are there not individual root domains for each ISO-registered country,
not just the US
by.
--
James
and
several links to online booksellers and libraries. Here's what an
in-copyright book scanned from a library looks like on Google Print
James
Routing and Security Administrator
At the Santa Fe Office: Cyber Mesa Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM
(505) 795-7101
моего плохого русского ;-)
Thanks,
James
Fiber would be my choice. Not only will it solve the lightening strike
problem; you will not have to worry about
ground potentials being different on each side of the cable run.
James
Routing and Security Administrator
At the Santa Fe Office: Cyber Mesa Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
-1 that allows an entity to
pay the onetime fee not have to pay the yearly fee ?
Tia , JimL
--
+--+
| James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give me VMS |
| NetworkEngineer | 3542 Broken
I grew up in the Baton Rouge New Orleans area; mom and my brother live in
BR. Katrina
is playing out the dooms day senerio that is well known to people living in
this area.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/K/KATRINA_THE_BIG_ONE_LAOL-?SITE=LABATSECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULT
James
On Aug 17, 2005, at 11:03 PM, routerg wrote:
What if you are a transit provider that serves ebay, yahoo, and/or
google and the worm is propogating over TCP port 80?
No one is suggesting that anyone suspend reason when making a
decision to temporarily, or permanently for that matter, block
On Aug 13, 2005, at 12:03 AM, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Good suggestions for Gadi. ,-)
- ferg
-- Christopher L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cool, among the 800k+ complaints we see a month (yes, 800k) there are
quite a few completely useless ones :( Anything sent in as a
I certainly understand why utility power goes out and that is the reason
why MCI loosing power confuses me. I am pretty sure that someone at MCI
also realizes why the blackout happens and how fragile things are.
It is irresponsible for a Tier 1 infrastructure provider to not be able to
needs to keep their network like this... but
the really bug guys at the core of their network yes.
JD
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Geo. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
James D. Butt
Unless there is some sort of crazy story related
we had a loss of comercial power(coned) in the downers grove terminal.
terminal is up on generator power now.
that seems to map to the internal firedrill as well, anyone else hit by
this event?
Electric utility had a sub-station burn up. resulting in a medium-sized
geographic area without
On Aug 10, 2005, at 6:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What techniques are you referencing? The technique Lynn demonstrated
has not been seen anywhere in the wild, as far as I know. He, nor
ISS, ever made the source code available to anyone outside of Cisco,
or ISS. What publication are you
On Aug 9, 2005, at 9:57 AM, J. Oquendo wrote:
Ironic the marketing and disinformation coming out of Cisco Systems
in relation to not disclosing what really occurred and labeling the
vulnerability as IPv6 based but after they initially stated
it as IPv6 only!
Its a half truth. The
On Aug 9, 2005, at 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are not Lynn's exploit techniques. The techniques were
published by someone else in considerable more detail than
Lynn along with source code.
What techniques are you referencing? The technique Lynn demonstrated
has not been seen
On Aug 9, 2005, at 3:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:08 EDT, James Baldwin said:
What techniques are you referencing? The technique Lynn demonstrated
has not been seen anywhere in the wild, as far as I know. He, nor
ISS, ever made the source code available
On Jul 28, 2005, at 3:29 AM, Neil J. McRae wrote:
I couldn't disagree more. Cisco are trying to control the
situation as best they can so that they can deploy the needed
fixes before the $scriptkiddies start having their fun. Its
no different to how any other vendor handles a exploit and
I'm
/prod_bulletin0900aecd80281c0e.html
James H. Edwards
Routing and Security Administrator
At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM
(505) 795-7101
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 12:58, Robert Crowe wrote:
This has nothing to do with the recent events.
- RC
james edwards wrote:
I am not sure if this is the correct doc, but it is recent (April/May 05)
and does indicate what IOS versions are being dropped and what IOS one
should migrate
I spoke with people with Lynn in Vegas and confirmed the following,
if anyone is watching the AP wire or Forbes you'll see that Cisco, et
al. and Lynn have settled the suit.
http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/ap/2005/07/28/ap2163964.html
On Jul 28, 2005, at 8:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I spoke with people with Lynn in Vegas and confirmed the following,
if anyone is watching the AP wire or Forbes you'll see that Cisco, et
al. and Lynn have settled the suit.
i missed the part where we, the likely actual injured parties, learn
to
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
