Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)

2004-04-19 Thread Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet
** Reply to message from Brian Russo [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:51:18 -0400 As far as mainstream users.. * Software needs to patch itself, users aren't going to do it. * Software needs to be intuitive, people interact with computers as if they were doing 'real' things. Things

Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)

2004-04-19 Thread Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet
** Reply to message from Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:42:53 -0400 -- Jeff said -- Patches either need to be of a size that a dialup user doesn't have to be dialed in for 24 hours to download and install them. Or .iso's should be available for ISP's to download,

Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)

2004-04-19 Thread Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet
** Reply to message from Jonathan M. Slivko [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:57:43 -0400 (GMT-04:00) -Original Message- From: Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Apr 19, 2004 1:39 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Microsoft

Re: google.

2004-04-16 Thread Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet
** Reply to message from Micah McNelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:08:27 -0700 is anyone having google reachability issues? /m Based on a traceroute I pulled as soon as I realized it, I think Savvis had a router problem. See hops 11 through 30. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc:633$