Alex Bligh wrote:
The irony of all this is that spammers already have all this information
-- yet registrars have gone out of their way to make it as difficult as
possible for everyone else to get it (rate-limiting queries and so on).
They clearly don't "already have" this information, or they woul
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > While I too am outraged by the actions of Verisign, I've decided to NOT
> > modify my servers in any way.
> > I might decide to block the sitefinder IP, but I will not change my
> > nameservers into modifying DNS responses. Doing so would be to break
things,
>
> *You
From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Returning NXDOMAIN when a domain does not exist is a basic requirement.
> Failure to do so creates security problems. It is reasonable to require
your
> customers to fix known breakage that creates security problems.
I agree completely. However, this
From: "Chris Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've been asked to forward this here on behalf of Martin A Brooks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> http://www.hinterlands.org/ver/txt
>
> It's a 'How to get your IP block removed from the list that Verisign will
> reply with SiteFinder for'.
AKA, "click here to
From: "Sean Donelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Smartcard has become a marketing buzzword, and its difficult to figure out
>what people are actually refering too.
Sorry, wrong word. I was actually refering to SafeWord/SecureID/ActivCard
type solutions, not "ATM cards with a chip". Sorry for the confus
From: "Sean Donelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Unfortunately there are a lot, and growing number, of self-infected PCs
> on the net. As the banks point out, this is not a breach of the bank's
> security. Nor is it a breach of the ISP's security. The user infects
> his PC with a trojan and then the
From: "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> route:217.208.0.0/13
> descr:TELIANET-BLK
> remarks: Abuse issues should be reported at
> remarks: http://www.telia.com/security/
> remarks: Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be auto-replied
> remarks: and referred to the U
From: "jnull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > But the article also says less than 2% of the "attacks" resulted
> > in a successful intrusion.
>
> 2% would be an embarrassingly large success rate for intrusion on a
> "secured" military network.
Not to mention the definition of "attack" the article seems
From: "E.B. Dreger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BV> Before IDNA, some application developers had developed
> BV> proprietary mechanisms designed to support IDNs. The Internet
>
> UTF-8 is a standard. MS products have used two-octet chars to
> support Unicode for a long time. Any reason to add yet ano
of the authority
section. I assume this is what you're refering to. This is correct behavior,
glue data is not an authorative answer and should therefore not be in the
answer section. This was a misimplementation in BIND prior to version 9.
Best regards,
Kandra Nygårds
10 matches
Mail list logo
