RE: ISPs slowing P2P traffic...

2008-01-14 Thread Lasher, Donn
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 12:03 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: ISPs slowing P2P traffic... >The wireless ISP business is a bit of a special case in this regard, where P2P traffic is

nanog@merit.edu

2007-08-08 Thread Lasher, Donn
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott >Weeks >Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:28 PM >To: nanog@merit.edu >Subject: RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T? >Does anyone else see the irony in all this if it does turn out to be cisco's >fault? High Availabilit

RE: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet

2007-04-13 Thread Lasher, Donn
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Sprunk Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 10:32 AM To: Mikael Abrahamsson Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes Subject: Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet >PMTU Black Hole Detection wo

RE: PG&E on data centre cooling..

2007-04-02 Thread Lasher, Donn
>I sorta wonder why the default is lights on, actually...I used to always love walking into dark datacenters and seeing the banks of GSRs >(always thought they had good Blink) and friends happily blinking away. > >What we really need is a datacenter with lit floor tiles. ;) > >John(damn I've been

RE: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names

2007-04-02 Thread Lasher, Donn
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Dambier >Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 4:46 AM >To: nanog@merit.edu >Subject: Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names > >Port 25 is bad. It has been blocked. I thought that. Rather, I thou

RE: broken DNS proxying at public wireless hotspots

2007-02-03 Thread Lasher, Donn
>If so, how do you configure your client operating system of choice to use the novel, un-proxied ports instead of using > port 53? * Set up the profile, to your house/work/etc, of your favorite SSH client to forward port 53 local to port 53 on your remote machine. * Make sure your SSH Profile c

RE: Need BGP clueful contact at Global Crossing

2006-12-14 Thread Lasher, Donn
On 14 Dec 2006 09:47:46 -0500, Michael A. Patton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If there are any BGP clueful contacts at Global Crossing listening (or >> if someone listening wants to forward this to them :-), I would >> appreciate your getting in touch. >Out of curiousity, why do you think any

RE: Sagonet - Failing miserably with network security Someone needs to handle this.

2006-10-30 Thread Lasher, Donn
Not that this is his real name, or business, but a whois on the IP yields: [whois.arin.net] Sago Networks SAGO-20030401 (NET-65-110-32-0-1) 65.110.32.0 - 65.110.63.255 Anton Tenev SAGO-65-110-62-120 (NET-65-110-62-120-1) 65.11

RE: In Memoriam: Abha Ahuja

2006-10-21 Thread Lasher, Donn
On 10/21/06, Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Five years ago today. I miss her. She was a great friend. You know, it's just my 2cents worth, but with all the other OT things that fly around the NANOG list, this topic might not be a bad one to spend a few email messages on,

RE: ARIN sucks? was Re: Kremen's Buddy?

2006-09-14 Thread Lasher, Donn
Jack Wrote: >I'm curious why you converted to RWHOIS. I SWIP'd my entire network to get my assignments. Many large ISPs still SWIP. > I didn't have time to mess with RWHOIS. Control. Auditing. We got tired of spending countless resources trying to keep track of what we had, what ARIN thought we

RE: ARIN sucks? was Re: Kremen's Buddy?

2006-09-14 Thread Lasher, Donn
>Richard A Steenbergen wrote: >>Try looking at it from an outsider's point of view instead. If you're >>new to dealing with ARIN, it is not uncommon to find the process is >>absolutely baffling, frustrating, slow, expensive, and requiring >>intrusive disclosure just shy of an anal cavity probe

RE: Determine difference between 2 BGP feeds

2006-04-18 Thread Lasher, Donn
On Apr 18, Scott Tuc Ellentuch at T-B-O-H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a utility that I can use that will pull the routes off each > router (Foundry preferred), and then compare them as best it can to > see why there is such a difference? I have one, but it's cisco-specific: >

RE: XO Peering

2006-04-11 Thread Lasher, Donn
>Does anyone else miss the good old days when nanog readers/attendees knew why pinging >the routers you saw in a traceroute directly was not an accurate measurement of anything? I miss the succinct, polite answers even more -donn

RE: Security control in DSL access network

2006-03-29 Thread Lasher, Donn
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: >Let me counter with: >ROUTER - ip/ethernet - DSLAM - ip/ethernet/atm/dsl - CPE - ip/ethernet - COMPUTER >In some cases a modern dslam will do routing as well. ATM was close to death before DSL came along, please don't CPR it anymore. Let it R.I.P.

RE: Fire in bakery fries fiber optic cable

2006-03-27 Thread Lasher, Donn
>I used to have a customer who were in the forestry business. They had a hundred miles or so of railroad down South that >went from one of their sawmills to places that had lots of trees, and ran some telecom >cables along them. Where they had bridges, the cables would hang >underneath the brid