On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Daniel Reed wrote:
> I am not sure it will take any major coordinated effort. For many outbreak
> incidents, the CDC would respond in the U.S., other agencies would respond
> elsewhere.
To perform a traceback in the US the CDC works with hospitals,
doctors, etc. since they h
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Daniel Reed wrote:
> paid regularly, or their budgets are kept low, etc. Many will have RFC 2142
> contacts, but appear to discard incoming mail. Some, such as Charter
> Communications, do not even have these mandatory addresses (mail is not
> accepted for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm interested to hear from those of you that might be using xacct, and your thoughts
on the product. To keep traffic down on the list, just reply to me.
If you are providing cable modem service and using xacct I'd really like to talk to
you.
For those of you that ask for a summary of the rep
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:41:33AM -0700, LeBlanc, Jason wrote something like this:
>
> There are some limitations as to where uRPF works, SONET only on GSRs for
> example (thanks Cisco). I believe it will work on 65xx (SUP1A and SUP2 I
> think) regardless of interface type. Impact should be
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:33:25PM -0400, Randy Bush wrote something like this:
>
> the gossip i am getting is that today is a particularly appropriate
> day to be reading the cisco is-is book
>
> randy
no default-information originate klez.virus
should remedy the situation.
-Mark
--
Toda
btw the permissions were wrong.
they are fixed now, enjoy.
-Mark
--
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ketchup is a vegetable.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 05:00:05PM -0400, Greg Pendergrass wrote something like this:
> implementations. Any suggestions?
>
> Greg
>
Greg,
Here's one document I received from Cisco. It was useful to me.
http://gomez.charter.com/~mark/ISISintro.pdf
-Mark
--
Read this tagline
