As predicted:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/020520/nym120_1.html
--Mitch
NetSide
"I am here to bury Caesar not to praise him".
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
> netside has been a long time lunatic opponent of RBLs
First they came for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the Catholics,
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > Such technology is very dangerous if automated.
>
> And if its not?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Such technology is very dangerous, period. Here they go again, trying
to elevate some Internet masterrace
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Mike Leber wrote:
> Also, when considering where to locate equipment I can't help but remind
> the other person posting about MNFX (which isn't the same corporate
> entitiy as PAIX) that they should have posted (if they were going to
> bother to post that kind of thing, whi
On Fri, 17 May 2002, todd glassey wrote:
> Mitch what has MFN's financial problems have to do with the quality of the
> agreements that are in place for peering. If you are worried that they may
> blow off the face of the earth - I too agree that money is tight and there
> are a number of othe
On Fri, 17 May 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> MH> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
> MH> From: Mitch Halmu
>
> MH> "Incredibly rich environments" indeed:
>
>
>
> Well, I guess that financial status says everything about their
> technica
On Fri, 17 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002 18:46:15 BST, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
> > The question related to places where network interconnect, not who's
> > friends with who this week.
>
> (Note - I'm assuming here the news story is factual. If not, that's
> a whole
On Fri, 17 May 2002, todd glassey wrote:
> PAIX is a division of MFN (Metropolitan Fiber Networks) as Above.NET is as
> well. That means they share MFN's connectivity and peering agreements and as
> such are incredibly rich environments. Especially with someone like Paul
> Vixie running it, (PA
Cable & Wireless had an outage in South Florida approx. between
12:50 - 16:10 EDT today. Anoyone privy to details?
--Mitch
NetSide
On 4 May 2002, Paul Vixie wrote:
> a cost that you are forced to pay in order to enrich somebody else is
> theft, no matter how microscopic the payment might be. "we all know what
> (they) are, now we're just arguing about the price."
"There will be a day when folks will need to pay to transi
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > I hate to sound like the big idiot here, but what exactly in the email
> > you received indicates no-ip.com spammed? It looks to me like you just
> > have some secret "admirer" who thought you wanted a no-ip.com account,
> > and no-ip.com emailed you to
On Fri, 3 May 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> Sorry to post this, but it appears that past emails to RoadRunner
> re a spammer (sending out attachments to boot) have been
> ineffective. Only ~150kB, but multiply that by however many
> victims... I'd think and hope *someone* cares.
>
> Back to on-t
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Andy Dills wrote:
> Ok, we have an opportunity to get Qwest bandwidth amazingly cheap.
[...]
> Can anybody speak positively or negatively about the quality of Qwest
You may want to also consider economic factors, as described in this article:
http://www.forbes.com/2002/04/
13 matches
Mail list logo
