2:48 PM
To: Mitchell, Dan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sprint peering policy
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:34:42PM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> a strong management team (after all, they *did* build MFS)
^
`- I think you have mistaken this for an endorsement.
And
learned from my own due dilligence via research on
the web, and I'm sure you'll find the same.
-Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Mitchell, Dan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sprint peering
Here's what I've "heard" about Sprint and peering...
Sprint's minimum to peer is 6 x OC-12's. To peer with them, you have to
undergo a 90-day trial period. At the end of the 90 days, they will
determine whether or not they would like to peer with you.
Here's the catch: During the 90-day tria
Hi all,
I have a customer that is located in Pakistan and is looking for a
reasonably priced connectivity option. He says he currently has a "16kbps
(CIR) Frame Relay link to AT&T's global FR cloud" and is paying (gasp!)
$1550 per month for it. Their last-mile link is Spread Spectrum radio. H
Chris,
I would recommend Webmin if you're looking for a straight-forward *NIX-based
control panel -- very easy to use, and you can limit access to other Webmin
features through account permissions. They're at http://webmin.com.
I believe Tzolkin makes a nice one as well, but it's a commercial
