will cause a flow to
stall -- we see this when Web access takes forever.
...
I suggest reading the excellent page:
High-Speed TCP Variants:
http://kb.pert.geant2.net/PERTKB/TcpHighSpeedVariants
[Charles N Wyble]
Hank,
This is in fact an excellent resource. Thanks for sharing it!
in business long with those kinds of numbers. Nor could they
keep an insurance carrier.
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
N. Richard Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FedEx will be your best bet. Trust me.
FedEx Heavy = pay a surcharge for heavy boxes, get it moved by a 120
pound delivery
Wireless is a good option with a few caveats:
1. At the speeds you are talking about, you need line of sight.
Usually, this means getting up high to account for curvature of the
earth and clearing of what is called the fresnel zone for the particular
frequency you are using.
2. You will need
Fletcher,
My primary responsibility here is engineering exactly these kinds of
systems.
The biggest difference between CWDM systems and DWDM systems is system
reach. Most CWDM systems are designed for short haul applications like
yours (approx 20km and under. Most DWDM systems are designed
I just got off the phone with an old boss of mine. ;-) It would appear
that there is a large fire at a ConEd plant that has now caused a
cascading power outage in the Northeast. Some more plants may have
tripped offline because of the load they absorbed from the loss of the
other plant.
Atlantech is local to me and sells a lot of DS1 internet access to Wireless ISPs.
Maybe a war driver is having some fun...
Drew Weaver wrote:
!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Times New
IIRC, too low a humidity level makes static electricity a problem. Too high makes
the cold air condense on your equipment. 60-65% sounds about right.
Todd Mitchell - lists wrote:
| and when I should
| complain to the datacenter operators? (References I can point to would
| be nice.)
I can tell you that FREQUENTLY the maps dont match the reality of utility placement.
Especially w.r.t. fiber paths. VERY few cable maps that are availaible accurately
reflect splice points or interconnects between mutiple cables entering a vault.
Without access to the specific GPS points
and will gladly
do so if anyone else would like to know.
I've got a new pickle I am trying to work through and have been wholly
unexcited by the solutions various vendors are talking about (read: $=x^n).
I am trying to signal over a dark fiber (SMF) loop of about 200 miles.
(150mi on one leg
I don't know of too many electrical distribution networks that use DC
interconnection to limit AC failures from propogating.
The main cause of AC disruption is a power plant getting out of phase
with the rest of the power plants on the grid. When that happens, the
plant "trips" of goes off-line
Vadim Antonov wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, N. Richard Solis wrote:
The main cause of AC disruption is a power plant getting out of
phase
with the rest of the power plants on the grid.
This is typically a result of sudden load change (loss of transmission
line, short, etc
to multihome with BGP, using any network size, is going to double
our BGP tables overnight. Perhaps its good that you must be of some size
to participate in public BGP. Many providers offer redundancy that is
more appropriate for the smaller networks.
--
,N
~Nathan - routing switching dude/fly-boy
everywhere once the Classfull C ranges are gone. As
others have mentioned... not all providers filter in the same way, and
sometimes the methods are not published. Its relatively safe to
make a *vague* judgement that a /24 will get you reachable via *most* of
the net.
--
,N
~Nathan - routing
Who did you think held the cellphone and the pager? :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David Lesher
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:32 AM
To: nanog list
Subject: Re: your mail
Unnamed Administration sources reported that N
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sean Donelan
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail)
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, David Lesher wrote:
Unnamed Administration sources reported that N. Richard Solis said
I think that getting caught is a good indication that they take the security
of the facility seriously. Some places will ban you forever if you violate
their policies. The mantrap thing is there for a reason. People are always
free to build out their own spaces however they wish. If you
at the front desk, show a badge to a camera around every
corner, and get your office keys from a vending machine you dont know what
real security looks like.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Majdi S. Abbas
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:13 PM
To: N
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Nathan Stratton
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 5:07 PM
To: N. Richard Solis
Cc: Majdi S. Abbas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: your mail
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, N. Richard Solis wrote:
Leaving or forcing doors to be propped
18 matches
Mail list logo
