I've thought long and hard about this, mostly from the perspective of
regional ILECs too small to implement MPLS.
QoS should be sold in 80k 'channel' increments. You, the carrier,
don't care what the customer is marking as DSCP EF, you just accept and
accelerate the first 80k x number
If you read up on juniper.net you'll see that in addition to the one
gigabit port PIC there is now a card with four SFP ports but only a
gigabit available via the backplane slot. This oversubscription of the
slot is good when you have several little switches you wish to drive and
don't
I don't know much about Juniper but I'm about to learn with a new job.
If I'm going to take full routes from a couple of upstreams and have a
couple of peers will the M10i (768M max) be enough or is the M20 (2048M
max) a better choice. Layout here is such that I'd expect to use a
single
There is really no ethernet connectivity to Verizon (UUNet) in the
505 Marquette building in ABQ? That seems very, very strange to me this
late in the game ... can anyone confirm/deny this for me?
M7i is a very, very attractive lab/spare box, but this company wants
carrier class - dual engine M10i are the minimum.
John Crain wrote:
You might even consider the m7i they can use the same cards
JC
On May 13, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 13-May-2007, at 15:33, Neal
AS16604 works fine, AS 22663 does not. I've picked at this for
several hours this AM - looks very much like 22663's serial interface,
144.232.250.20/30, is blackholed somewhere inside Sprint. I got a tech
who is trying to help, but he is the guy who got stuck with Easter
Sunday ...
for that /30.
Hopes this helps.
-Justin
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, neal rauhauser wrote:
AS16604 works fine, AS 22663 does not. I've picked at this for
several hours this AM - looks very much like 22663's serial interface,
144.232.250.20/30, is blackholed somewhere inside Sprint. I got
I've got a customer terminating a McLead and a Sprint DS3 on a single
7507. I'm preparing to break this up into two border routers and I'm a
little puzzled by the choice to force router ID to be the IP address of
the customer's side of the McLeod DS3. The machine didn't have a
loopback
If I'm going to do high availability with Cisco 75xx running RSP4s
which OS is the best? I picked 12.2.34 as being most stable for BGP
features, but I'm just starting on the HA stuff and I don't see any of
the redundancy knobs in this version of the OS.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] //
The fiber cable hit by bullet was in New Jersey if I'm recalling
correctly ... this was maybe four or five years ago. If memory serves
(and forty *is* uncomfortably close) this was part of a cable modem plant.
Mark Smith wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:16:34 -0500
Aaron Gagnier [EMAIL
http://www.flickr.com/photos/avyakata/67337020/
This is Manion's Auction House in Kansas City, Kansas. The photo was
taken the day after an F3 tornado went over the top of the site. The
smooth, gray rectangle just below the trailer is not parking ... that is
the floor of what used to be
Mechanical pencil, a sheet of paper for a straight edge, and a penny
when you want to make a proffesional looking round object. I publish to
Flickr using macro mode on my Fuji Finepix 5100 to make the picture.
No little Cisco hockey puck stencils, but last year when I sketched a
I'm talking to an ISP in eastern Nebraska who has a DS3 to Sprint.
They've got a peer they tie to with private fiber. That peer has a DS3
from ATT. Both normally see 20ms response times on pings from their
border routers to the carrier router. Since last Thursday the Sprint
connected
If it is a high value target (government, banking, etc) you should
deploy a layer 3 security solution such as IPsec between the end points.
If the solution is based on a proprietary bridge radio where the only
method of snooping is to have a development version of the radio ...
well ...
Doug,
Don't tease - you absolutely owe us the full text of the response
from the fellow who was upset about your asking for a public SSH key as
part of the interview process.
Neal
Doug Luce wrote:
I rely on recruiters to funnel applicants to the company. I also
Position
so you want my public ssh key or you won't consider me for you're position??
FUCK YOU!!!
how's that
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, neal rauhauser wrote:
Doug,
Don't tease - you absolutely owe us the full text of the response
from the fellow who was upset about your asking
It has been mentioned in other places on the net (ok, yammerings on
slashdot, but this made a bit of sense) that blacklisting is a perfect
P2P application.
Each mailserver could keep a cryptographically verified list, the
list is distributed via some P2P mechanism, and DoS directed at
Oh come on people, this guy *implements* stuff. Here he is on the list
describing how he has implemented something to alleviate the problems
caused by PHBs at Verisign.
ISC bind mods, ICANN displeasure, and other sources of pressure will
either remove this issue or make it irrelevant.
Cisco 4x00 frame rails are the king - bend 'em and you'll be using a
chisel to open the metal chassis so you can remove the NPs. I've still
got a 4000 around here somewhere that was shuffled to lab duty after I
did surgery on it with a large cold chisel mallet.
Matt wrote:
Hello all,
I've just upgraded a Cisco 7206 for a customer with a DS3 and we're
now ready to take full routes. No one is answering at support, email has
gone unanswered for thirty minutes - if someone at the Sprint NOC is
awake please call Neal or Mike at 402-426-6136 - we'd really like to get
this done
:
On Fri Aug 29, 2003 at 04:10:27AM -0500, neal rauhauser wrote:
I've just upgraded a Cisco 7206 for a customer with a DS3 and we're
now ready to take full routes. No one is answering at support, email has
gone unanswered for thirty minutes - if someone at the Sprint NOC is
awake please
Geez, all I wanted was a little help, and I get pounced on by a
platoon of eager Sprint BGP gurus.
The desired filter change, it is done, and Sprint, who has always been
my first choice as a provider, just lengthened their lead a little more.
neal rauhauser wrote:
I could
I could really use an assist from someone at Sprint - I'm a
consultant for an AS that receives service from two ISPs who peer with
Sprint. One of them is a healthy regional who listens to me about BGP,
the other, well, I wish them the best of luck, but we really, really,
really want to put a
PA-POS for OC3-c can be pretty expensive - $3000 or so. If you don't
mind the cell tax the PA-A1-OC3 are only $500 or so but I'm not sure if
they ever made a VXR model of this card. The PA-A3-OC3 are about $1000.
The difference between the PA-A1 and PA-A3, besides the possible
VXR/non VXR
No one loves me and I don't get much email from the folks who tolerate
me. I just got back from having lunch with some guys who tolerate me and
I found scads of messages from all over -the funniest among the bunch
for our Nanog readers:
user@cisco.com
user@tacnet.com
user@wcom.com
I prefer to think of it as having evolved to a higher plane of
existence :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:10:12 CDT, neal rauhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No one loves me and I don't get much email from the folks who tolerate
me. I just got back from having
perfectly functional adult alternatives exist.
I'd really like to get down and roll in the muck with you guys, but
I'm busying replacing M$ systems with FreeBSD 4.8 ...
- Original Message -
From: neal rauhauser 402-301-9555
To: Måns Nilsson ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
Someone has changed the channel topic to CLOSED, Thanks for the post
to NANOG :-(
But I don't see hosts being k-lined - I imagine if IRCops took an
interest in this they'd be lopping off heads.
The controlling node for this problem seems to be:
spaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the
Måns Nilsson wrote:
Firewalls are a patch to broken network application architechture. If
your applications would have been properly designed, you would not have
the need for firewalls. They are for perimeter defence only anyway.
Right on - if you can't plug a machine directly in to
29 matches
Mail list logo
