it would be much appreciated.
In my own instances, posting private security related information to
the internet seemed like a bad idea, so I must politely refuse.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to get that high up after
literally 2.5 hours of fighting, but the guy I got put me on hold for
30 minutes and then promised to call me back and did not.
My usual friend of a friend contacts have failed, so I'd appreciate help.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Maimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or perhaps do you mean previous owners can call in a "stop order" or
> "dispute" the transfer unilaterally within X days of occurence, much
> like it works for many REAL money transactions?
That makes considerable sense. You should be able to call in, say
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If I were Panix ...
>
> Free advice. Bruce, Cliff and Chuck are people. Yes, even Chuck is a people.
> You want prompt service, you ask nice and you ask the right people and you
> don't assume there are facts not in evidence,
Mark Jeftovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Once upon a time, Steven M. Bellovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > panix.com has apparently been hijacked. It's now associated with a
>> > different registrar -- melbourneit instead of dotster -- and a
>> > different owner. Can anyone suggest approp
s, like doing random walks of
the port space in thousands of blocks at once from large numbers of
scan hosts -- any given CIDR block only sees the occasional packet,
and they don't have nice signatures like being sequential and from the
same initiating address. Taken to extreme levels, you will never catch
such people. Spend your time fixing security holes on your net instead.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
data.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"John Crain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *PLEASE NOTE*
> This is an important Informational Message to the internet community:
>
> November 5, 2002, the IP address for J.root-servers.net will
> change in the authoritative NS set for "dot".
Why is this change being made?
Also:
> Th
