> Hello,
>
> I just experienced my first official DDoS attack against my network.
> I never realized how helpless I was :(. I had roughly 70 mbps of
> traffic aimed at one IP. The IP wasn't even in use, I'm assuming
> someone typed the wrong IP and meant to send it somewhere else. I shut
>
>
> sbc/yahoo and them wee doing upgrades on their email
> last night could be moving things around to accomodate
>
> -Henry
>
> --- Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Similar issues with Yahoo on and off since about
> > 8:30am (EST).
> >
> > -Drew
> >
> > -Original Message-
>
>
> > I saw this coming two days ago but, nobody ["Called"]. Akamai's DNS was
> > failing apart and we thought that we were just being dns blackhole!
>
> No, you didn't. You saw a different problem, asked me about it, and
didn't
> send back any of the info I asked for.
>
> Don't let truth and fa
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick W.Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Patrick W.Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Akamai DNS Issue?
>
> On Jun 16, 2004, at 1:26 PM,
Any idea whats going on with nitrous.algx.net? It
seems as if there are no responses from the route server in the old MAE-East and
yet there are responses Ashburn and PAIX.
And what ever happened to MAE-Central and
MAE-West?
- Peter
301-340-1533
> > I think the only advantage to DOJ working this hard on LI capabilities
is that
> >it may raise public awareness of the issue, and, may help get better
cryptographic
> >technologies more widely deployed sooner. Other than that, I think it's
just a lose
> >all the way around.
>
> I'm not advoc
> >
> > They, "the DOJ" is just trying to do it's job, as they are under the
> > microscope due to the fumbles that led to the compromises by an
obviously
> > inept predecessor. Now, they are tighten the screws on everything from
> > telecoms to bank accounts; to prevent another round of fumbl
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Karrenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net
>
> On 22.07 17:08, Paul Vixie wrote:
> >
> > therefore if
Hey Folks,
It appears that NSI isn't talking to the GTLD, got any ideas?
Sponsoring Registrar: Network Solutions, Inc. Registrar (R122-LRMS)
Status: INACTIVE ?
Status: OK
All the best,
Peter Schroebel
sh ip bgp 66.164.232.1
BGP routing table entry for 66.164.232.0/24, version 19268449
Paths: (3 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
701 6389 6197
205.171.0.96 (metric 10) from 205.171.0.151 (205.171.0.151)
Origin IGP, metric 1, localpref
Contact ChoiceNetworks and they can point you in the right direction, been
there too ;-)
>
> Anyone know the name/contact information of a relatively high Sr.
> manager at Verizon involved in their high-cap provisioning in the
> NY/NJ metro region? I have a dedicated t1 going on its 4th month
11 matches
Mail list logo
