At 1:20 AM -0700 5/2/02, Scott Francis wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:07:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You've got to be kidding. Do you think it's clear to the average consumer
buying a GPRS phone what NAT is, and why they might or might not want it?
The average customer buying a
At 11:15 AM +0200 5/2/02, Daniska Tomas wrote:
no eye-shutting. it's just about considering HOW MANY (or WHAT PART) of
your users will need the 'full' service. if you have 95% of bfu's with
web+mail phones or pda's then nat is completely ok for them. and those 5%
(if so many ever) phreaks -
At 11:34 AM -0700 5/2/02, Scott Francis wrote:
And what if I want to invent the next big thing? A game, that people play
in real time, with their palm-sized gizmo. What if that game can't be made
scalable unless those devices have real IPs? What if that game is the
catalyst that causes a
, | Peter Bierman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Packet with a bit not set | http://www.sfgoth.com/pmb/
SYN ACK SYN ACK, |Nobody realizes that some people expend
We all go down. -A. Stern | tremendous energy merely to be normal.-Al Camus
