Is anyone seeing peering problem with GBLX?
We've seen peering problems on GBLX across NA. It's being felt by
many of their peering partners and, in turn, being felt by many of
our customers. We're sending a generic report to the effected
customers and will try to get more info on the
It would have been nice if the reporter bothered to mention that Internet
speed records are measured in terabit meters per second. An article
about Internet speed records that doesn't include the actual record, or even
a definition of the term Internet speed record, is hardly deserving of
Bravo, Lou! Anyway, one of the *virtues* of the Net has
always been its anarchic and chaotic nature. Trying
to set things into neat, regimented lines will get us
back to the OSI way of doing things. I revile spammers,
hate spam, and throw out tons of it; but I'd hate
regimentation and
Sean,
Plus ca change, plus c'est le meme chose.
Of course the past is with us: look at Bob
Metcalfe's RFC 602 (1973). Have we fixed
anything over the nearly 30 years? How
recently have you seen a password on a Post-It?
How many folks have their spouse's/significant other's/
offspring's
David, what does from mean in your rules?
with .cc at the end? But there are very many
places with addresses in TLDs and ccTLDs other
than the geographical location.
passing through an AS known to be in a given
location?
Peter
It's quite interesting, Mike and Sean, to note that on
Symantec's Expanded Security Response List
//securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Advisories.html
there is nothing (that's right, nothing) at all between
January 21 and January 27, 2003.
As I said the other day, this is an
I attribute this to over-zealous marketing. As I
mentioned at the NANOG BoF, there is, indeed, a
decrease in latency about 6 hours prior to the
actual mass attack. Mike Lloyd (RouteScience)
saw this, too. There's also a decrease about
16 hours out. Sean suggested that they might be
Though it was written nearly two years ago, John
Quarterman's Monoculture Considered Harmful
remains the very best exposition of this issue.
//www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_2/quarterman/
Peter
Verio appears to have had a number of problems
yesterday: We noticed a tremendous packet loss
spike and a loss in reachability to various sites.
Verio states that it had issues [!] with www1501 and
that customers in Boca Raton may have experienced
delays.
Anyone know what happened?
Peter
CW is divesting itself of a lot of real estate these
days. It struck a deal with Primus concerning its
voice customers (last week), now its DSL customers to
New Edge.
Moreover, the BBC reports today that CW is cutting 3500 jobs
worldwide and also announced heavy losses. CW announced
that
Am I the only one to find this ludicrous?
Expecting ICANN to competently hand these things is
analogous to asking the Captain of the Titanic
about how to handle icebergs.
Peter
That's root-servers.org, Sean.
Peter
Ralph,
You and alex exchanged:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a more accurate method to determine the country of origin for an
IP than the methods I've described above?
Yes, at least three companies have databases of pretty much all /24s and
above mapped up
Andre,
I fail to see where a pointer to the French version of Dodge's
UCL-based cybergeography pages responds to Ralph's queries.
Peter
Craig,
We saw real hits on both Genuity and on NYC Teleglobe
on Saturday. Both in latency and in packet loss.
Our 9/11 graphs are visible at //order.mids.org/~peter/index.html
where I put them following the event and on the NANOG 23 (Oct. 2001)
site.
Peter
Absolutely dead on, Sandy.
And Padlipsky is still available.
See my review in the most recen issue
of The Internet Protocol Journal (June 2002).
M. A. Padlipsky, The Elements of Networking Style.
ISBN 0595088791 (orig. 1985; iUniverse, 2000)
Peter
If you go to //ftp.arin.net/pub/stats,
you can pick up all three RIRs. Then
grep for KR in APNIC.
Voila!
Peter
17 matches
Mail list logo
