something not very far from the discussion on this thread was proposed
last year by some researchers at columbia. for those of you who like
reading academic papers:
http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~danr/publish/2002/Kero2002:SOS-camera.pdf
-- ratul
Aaron Dewell wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003,
It is not clear if you mean that tools (e.g. BGP) are
primitive, languages to express policy in BGP are
primitive, or application of what we have (BGP + whatever
language you use) is primitive. Which is it (or which
subset)?
i would argue all of them; they
Any chance the Rocketfuel project had a chance to map out UUNET/Worldcom
since the first run?
not yet. but we intend to get to it soon; a lot of people have asked the
same question.
-- ratul
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was also some interesting work done on
since we are on the subject of availability of good data, i'd like to ask
the list what i have been contemplating for some time now.
understanding of routing (especially inter-domain) in the research
community is really primitive. this precludes us from having realistic
routing models. we
manage it very poorly, you pay $Z+z').
-- ratul
ps: since i don't run networks myself, all of this may be something that is
obviously asinine. would be great if someone was to point out if that is
the case, and why.
Ratul Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have related
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Jake Khuon wrote:
There were workable solutions even back then. I think we all just chose the
path of least resistance because it was easier and the risk factours were
perceived to be low. We all know that was a false assumption. I remember
the first smurf
