Re: AS41961 not seen in many networks

Not seeing any of the routes, or any routes from AS41961. UUNET, Sprint, and ATT connectivity. On Thu, January 4, 2007 05:57, Sebastian Rusek wrote: Hi, Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes: 194.60.78.0/24 194.60.204.0/24 194.153.114.0/24 from new AS41961. It seems

Re: Worms versus Bots

While following the thread, I did a bit of Googling, then browsing 3Com's site: http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?tab=featurespathtype=purchasesku=3CRFW200B On-NIC firewall w/remote management. On Tue, 11 May 2004, Chris Woodfield wrote: :Simple solution...build the on-NIC

Re: DS-3 test equipment

Replying with responses to my own post: The overwhelming response was TTC/Acterna T-Berd with a couple of Digitial Lightwaves thrown in, plus a hit each for Anritsu and Sunset. Thanks for all the information. Rick On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Rick Ernst wrote: : : :I've searched the archives

DS-3 test equipment

I've searched the archives and find some hits on DS-1 test gear, but I'm looking for opinions/experience with DS-3 test gear. We've started bringing up more DS-3 circuits, both directly to customers and also for Frame/ATM/DSL aggregation. Telco used to do all provisioning and testing for us,

domainmonger.com with wildcard NS?

This was brought to my attention by a friend. It looks like ns1.domainmonger.com and ns2.domainmonger.com are doing wildcard A records for all zones, including those that already exist. If you go to their site and try to register a domain, it properly shows if the domain exists or not. I'm

Re: dry pair

Have you tried ordering it as an alarm circuit? Also, it seems like telcos are less willing to provide dry pair anymore. On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Austad, Jay wrote: : :Does anyone know to go about getting Qwest or a CLEC to patch through a dry :pair between two buildings connected to the same

Tier-1 without their own backbone?

We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac OC-3. One of the responses came back with we won't be competive with provider because they don't have their own backbone. Is there a cross-reference for provider vs network backbone, or is this just something that we

Layer 5+ inspection at the border?

I'm looking for a beast that is roughly a combination of Cisco NBAR and Foundry URL inspection. NBAR worked pretty well for CodeRed, but I'd rather have a dedicated device rather than overloading a router with non-routing functions. I haven't used Foundry's URL inspection, but it looks

The internet is slow

Gah.. I hate these kind of vague problems. I have multiple users complaining about the internet is slow; specifically to sites such as aol, cnn, amazon. Our support folks are also having trouble getting to postini's admin pages. Things are excruciatingly slow. I don't see any indications on

Re: The internet is slow

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Rick Ernst wrote: : : :Gah.. I hate these kind of vague problems. : :I have multiple users complaining about the internet is slow; specifically :to sites such as aol, cnn, amazon. Our support folks are also having trouble :getting to postini's admin pages. Things

Re: The internet is slow

Packet loss within UUNET, apparently localized to the Portland (OR) area. I've turned down our peer with them and things are looking much better. Thanks for all the help/responses. Rick

Re: AS-Tree Utility

Wow. First I've heard of this. Repeat... Wow :) I took our 3 feeds and munged that data, then started playing with how is so-n-so connected. Pretty/interesting, and possibly even useful. On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, steve uurtamo wrote: : : I'm curious if anyone could point me to a utility for

Re: AS-Tree Utility

I've been asked twice off-list; here's the implentation I found: http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/ On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, steve uurtamo wrote: : : I'm curious if anyone could point me to a utility for AS-Tree mapping from a : routing table output? I searched the archive a bit,

Re: Latency generator?

FreeBSD and DUMMYNET? On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Temkin, David wrote: :Does anyone know of any free, cheap, or potentially rentable latency :generators? Ideally I'd like something that just sits between two ethernet :devices to induce layer 2/3 latency in traffic, but am open to any :options... : :

69/8 revisited

We were just allocated a /17 out of 69/8. With all off the recent traffic on 69/8 reachability problems, I asked ARIN if the allocation could come from a different block. Their answer was basically that 69/8 (only) is where they are allocating from and that from reading NANOG, it appears that