> > Does anyone else, based upon the assumptions above, believe this
statement
> > to be patently incorrect (specifically, the part about 'personal
> > information had not been at risk.') ?
>
> Which not technically correct, they are not technically incorrect
> either.
Hm. One possible attack on
> i don't believe that 2 or 3 will ever happen, for simple market reasons --
> it is harder to make money if you do 2 or 3. however, 1 only costs a
small
> bit of ops expense, and has no market impact at all, so it's practical in
> simple economic terms.
Not only that, but unless _everyone_ impl
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 14:29, Cleve Mickles wrote:
> ...so what exactly did we(AOL) do to get referenced
> in this email thread?
Years of marketing that made "AOL" interchangable with "the Internet"
for a large percentage of the tv viewing world. ;)
--
Ryan Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 18:22, John M. Brown wrote:
>
> What is your learned opinion of having host accounts
> (unix machines) with UID/GID of 0:0
>
> jmbrown_r:password:0:0:John M. Brown:/export/home/jmbrown:/bin/mysh
The biggest argument I have against creating accounts with uid 0, is
that ev
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 10:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What kind of implact on the global internet would we see should we observe
> nearly simultaneous detonation of 500 kilogramms of high explosives at N of the
> major known interconnect facilities?
Keep in mind that traffic in the global int
