Excerpts from Owen DeLong on Sun, Oct 15, 2006 08:14:48AM -0700:
This may be a nit, but, you will _NEVER_ see AC power at any
In addition to all of the offered AC services others have mentioned,
some planes have power outlets for vacuum cleaners, typically behind a
small panel next to a door.
On 07/21/2005 09:32 AM, Joe Abley allegedly wrote:
On 20 Jul 2005, at 21:46, Brad Knowles wrote:
In the case of regular cell phones, if you are roaming on a
network in a foreign country, or you have rented a local phone, I
understand that the carriers have gotten together and made
On 07/12/2005 13:51 PM, Adam Rothschild allegedly wrote:
Since the vent buildings are owned operated by the
NY/NJ Port Authority, it seems conceivable they could have pulled the
power if they wanted to. Whether or not they did is best left as an
exercise for the nanog-l army of political
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 09:21:24AM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom allegedly wrote:
Yes, but nobody ever wrote a song about the TOS bits in Internet
Protocol (this song dates to 1980):
http://www.poppyfields.net/filks/00182.html
If anyone has the words to Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory of the
On 4/28/2005 05:00, Alex Bligh allegedly wrote:
I think Bill is actually correct. ITU is a treaty organization. Only
members of the UN (i.e. countries). ITU-T (and ITU-R, ITU-D) are sector
organizations that telcos can join (AIUI the difference having arisen
when a meaningful difference arose
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 08:43:15AM +0900, Dave Crocker allegedly wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:55:04 -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
? My favorite quote is:
? All countries want to counter spam -- unsolicited commercial
messages that ? can flood email accounts by the hundreds and burden
the web
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 10:29:15PM -0800, Fred Baker allegedly wrote:
The thing that brings me out here is the one size fits all reasoning that
seems to soll around this community so regularly. Multihoming should
always use provider-independent addressing and Multihoming should always
use
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 09:35:09AM -0600, Jack Bates allegedly wrote:
Without looking it up (a little busy), there should be a Definitions
section defining communications service provider. Is the bill aimed at
ISP's or is it aimed at the actual Telco?
Also a communication.
