Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Justin, if Provider A _has_ permission from Provider B to announce a
prefix, do you believe Provider A should be allowed to announce the
prefix?
As long as all of the relevant parties know about it and are OK with it,
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Does browser caching still work these days? I thought all web admins
disabled it on their servers because they can't be bothered to think
about which cache directives to send along with each page. I can rarely
return to a previously viewed page without the browser
Chris Owen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 3, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Simon Leinen wrote:
You write when rather than if - is ignoring reasonable TTLs
current practice?
Definitely. We've seen 15 minute TTLs regularly go 48 hours without
updating on Cox or Comcast's
Answers interlined:
Rick Kunkel wrote:
- Do you offer QOS services across your network for VOIP or other types of
traffic?
Yes.
- Do you do this on a per-customer basis, or is it done globally?
Globally
- For those that offer QOS services for VOIP, is traffic classification
done by
Gadi Evron wrote:
[snip]
The previous unaddressed threat which most of us chose to ignore was
spoofing. We all knew of it for a very long time, but some of us believed
it did not pose a threat to the Internet or their networks for no other
reason than it is not currently being exploited and
David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
You work so hard to defend people that exploit children? Interesting. We are
talking LEA here and not the latest in piracy law suits. The #1 request from a
LEA in my experience concerns child exploitation.
I
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:20:18 +0200
Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear NANOGers,
It irks me that today, the effective MTU of the internet is 1500
bytes, while more and more equipment can handle bigger packets.
What do you guys think about a mechanism
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also find it curious that you claim to have people on staff at your
company who know what SWIP means. Perhaps you could ask them to share
that information with us since I have never seen this documented
anywhere. Do they really know what you claim they know?
Frank Bulk wrote:
[[Attribution deleted by Frank Bulk]]
Neither I nor J. Oquendo nor anyone else are required to
spend our time, our money, and our resources figuring out which
parts of X's network can be trusted and which can't.
It's not that hard, the ARIN records are easy to look up.
Kradorex Xeron wrote:
What needs to be done is the ISPs allowing botnets and malware to run rampid
on their networks to be held accountable for being negligent on their network
security, Service provider abuse mailboxes should be paid more heed to, and
reports should be acted upon,
The
Gadi Evron wrote:
Amen. Really.
I'd honestly like more ideas.
What did IETF and ICANN say when you approached them through their
public-comment channels?
Douglas Otis wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 16:47 -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
For some operations or situations 24 hours would be too long a time to wait.
There would need to be some mechanism where the delay could be bypassed.
What operation requires a new domain be published within 24 hours?
John Kinsella wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 02:53:58AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dorn Hetzel) writes:
I preferred the darkness of PAIX back in the late 90's. We had a
christmas tree in our cage and it looked great in the dark :)
that was brian reid's idea, and it was a
Gadi Evron wrote:
Anyway, I have a friend who used managed to get Not A Janitor on his
business card.
My all-time favorite business card was one from Autodesk from the chief
financial officer, who appeared to be a real Niven fan:
Speaker to Bankers
Dennis Dayman wrote:
I have a customer having some DNS issues. They have done some research
regarding some DNS timeout errors they saw with Verizon's sender verify
looking up their MX records. What they have discovered is their current
DNS service has a 1% failure/timeout rate. They are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then there's the whole trust issue - though the Team Cymru guys do an awesome
job doing the bogon feed, it's rare that you have to suddenly list a new
bogon at 2AM on a weekend. And there's guys that *are* doing a good job
at tracking down and getting these sites
Jared Mauch wrote:
linking to stuff like the bogon-announce list too wouldn't
be a bad idea either :)
Bogon announce list?
David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
On Nov 5, 2006, at 1:51 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Could you be any less descriptive of the problem you are seeing?
the internet is broken. anyone know why?
Did you ping it?
is that what broke it?
I'm sure it just
Chris Jester wrote:
65.110.62.120
Sagonet,
We have a serious hacker here who is ACTIVLY engaged in logins
on our network (have him in a honeypot at the moment). He is running
exploits from your network and
also I have been hearing from others that you have been notified of this
a few times
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Chris Jester wrote:
Also, what about ARINS hardcore attitude making it near impossible
to aquire ip space, even when you justify it's use? I have had
nightmares myself as well as MANY of my collegues share similar experiences.
I am having an issue right now with a
20 matches
Mail list logo
