Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

2002-05-09 Thread Terence Giufre-Sweetser
> > We're trying to discourage bulk emailers, not individuals. > > Then the way to do this is to make the cost of sending mass mail more > expensive than sending only a few here and there. In short, we need a > way to prevent the use of the $19.95 throw-away account that is used > to send the

Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

2002-05-09 Thread Terence Giufre-Sweetser
> 2002-04-05 | 116 > 2002-04-04 | 125 > 2002-04-03 |91 > 2002-04-02 |88 > 2002-04-01 |97 > (33 rows) > > go ahead and "Just Hit Delete" if you want. if this idiot idea ("the `you can delete it' one) continues on, there's going to be a market for ultra long life, MILSPEC, D

Re: Internet Exchange Questions

2002-03-21 Thread Terence Giufre-Sweetser
> I know of 323 IXes today. > http://www.pch.net/documents/data/exchange-points/ep-in-addrs.xls Good to see AusBONE there, however it does seem that your recent public comments on AusBONE may need some clarification, specially when you have not bothered to seek any information from the people r