Original Message-
> From: Stephen Sprunk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 8:00 PM
> To: Tim Thorpe
> Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
> Subject: Re: Anti-spam System Idea
>
> This topic has been consistently ruled off-topic for NANOG
Getting a bit long, I like it :D.
What would be a netops general response to scans of this nature?
If these exist then why are we still having problems? Why do we let
customers who have been infected flood the networks with traffic as they do?
Should they not also be responsible for the security of their computers? Do
we not do enough to educate?
...> addresses (or even
> > addresses that ar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Wiacek
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:12 AM
> To: Tim Thorpe
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anti-spam System Idea
>
>
> It just doesn't
14, 2004 12:45 AM
> To: 'Tim Thorpe'
> Subject: RE: Anti-spam System Idea
>
> Hi, Tim.
> A couple of the RBL (real-time black hole listing, in case
> you're not already familiar with them) providers already do
> something like this. SORBS and NJABL stick
I wanted to run this past you to see what you thought of it and get some
feedback on pro's and cons of this type of system.
I have been thinking recently about the ever increasing amount of spam that
is flooding the internet, clogging mail servers, and in general pissing us
all off.
I think it
