On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Mark Bojara wrote:
Hello All,
If I wish to purchase a Cisco router that handles a full internet BGP
feed what are the minimum specs I should be looking at?
Regards Mark Bojara
If that is your ONLY requirement you can probably get a 4500M or 4700M
cheap on EBAY. With
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Mark Bojara wrote:
Well it must also be able to do QoS aswell
Oh, you want it to forward packets also? How many PPS/How much bandwith?
but I take it thats pretty much standard in most 12.x IOS's..
Well, if you plan to run anything other than 12.0 you can forget about the
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Brett Watson wrote:
I was just having a hard time believing ATT was leaking 10/8 and that
any other large provider was accepting it so wanted to verify.
Wasn't it established that they did infact not leak it but just routed it
inside their own network?
//tlund
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Rodney Joffe wrote:
The NOAA links seem saturated... http://www.sec.noaa.gov/
Yeah.. The story was on slashdot:
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/23/175252mode=threadtid=134tid=160
taken from space.com:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Andy Walden wrote:
Actually, as far as I know, all switches and routers use the CPU to
process ICMP. It is a control protocol and the safest option is to
ensure the vendor has implemented some sort of CPU rate-limiting so it
can't be overwhelmed.
Redbacks SmartEdge 800
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Chris Adams wrote:
It appears that the most reliable way to detect a wildcard response for
'somedomain.tld' is to query for '*.tld'; if the results match, then
'somedomain.tld' doesn't really exist.
Just make up a number of fake domains and resolve them. If they return
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Johnny Eriksson wrote:
idea for next virus: after reproducing itself, construct a random domain
name ending in .net and ddos it at a low rate for a day or so. if the
faked up domain is someones real one, you get a small number of packets
to that domain. if a large
