Re: minimum requirements for a full bgp feed

2005-01-03 Thread Tomas Lund
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Mark Bojara wrote: > Well it must also be able to do QoS aswell Oh, you want it to forward packets also? How many PPS/How much bandwith? > but I take it thats pretty much standard in most 12.x IOS's.. Well, if you plan to run anything other than 12.0 you can forget about th

Re: minimum requirements for a full bgp feed

2005-01-03 Thread Tomas Lund
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Mark Bojara wrote: > Hello All, > > If I wish to purchase a Cisco router that handles a full internet BGP > feed what are the minimum specs I should be looking at? > > Regards Mark Bojara If that is your ONLY requirement you can probably get a 4500M or 4700M cheap on EBAY. Wi

Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?

2004-01-22 Thread Tomas Lund
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Brett Watson wrote: > I was just having a hard time believing AT&T was leaking 10/8 and that > any other large provider was accepting it so wanted to verify. Wasn't it established that they did infact not leak it but just routed it inside their own network? //tlund

Re: NOAA warning for rf communications

2003-10-24 Thread Tomas Lund
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Rodney Joffe wrote: > The NOAA links seem saturated... http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ Yeah.. The story was on slashdot: http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/23/175252&mode=thread&tid=134&tid=160 taken from space.com: http://space.com/scienceastronomy/solar_storm_031023

Re: Extreme BlackDiamond

2003-10-13 Thread Tomas Lund
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Andy Walden wrote: > Actually, as far as I know, all switches and routers use the CPU to > process ICMP. It is a control protocol and the safest option is to > ensure the vendor has implemented some sort of CPU rate-limiting so it > can't be overwhelmed. Redbacks SmartEdge 8

RE: What *are* they smoking?

2003-09-15 Thread Tomas Lund
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Johnny Eriksson wrote: > idea for next virus: after reproducing itself, construct a random domain > name ending in .net and ddos it at a low rate for a day or so. if the > faked up domain is someones real one, you get a small number of packets > to that domain. if a large n

Re: What *are* they smoking?

2003-09-15 Thread Tomas Lund
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Chris Adams wrote: > It appears that the most reliable way to detect a wildcard response for > 'somedomain.tld' is to query for '*.tld'; if the results match, then > 'somedomain.tld' doesn't really exist. Just make up a number of fake domains and resolve them. If they return