Re: your mail

2002-08-09 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
any longer anyways. >From: Scott Granados <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Ukyo Kuonji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: your mail >Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT) > >Do people really almost get fired for what they write here? I'

Dailup IP list and Earthlink email servers

2002-07-09 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
Within the last 24 hours, an email server I have been using for over 3 years has started being denied by Earthlink's email servers for being an open relay OR dailup server. The server is neither, and has been secured against relaying for well over 2 years. The server is sitting on a busines

Re: Sprint peering policy

2002-07-01 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
>From: dre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >You might be able to sit in a colo and buy some cheap transit from one >provider (especially if the colo isn't carrier neutral). However, if you >want diversity in your upstreams, peering quickly becomes a reality. If you have to buy an OC48 (or dark fiber) f

Re: Sprint peering policy

2002-07-01 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
>From: Clayton Fiske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Nor does it cost $0 on top of that $200 to buy transit. But, looking at today's $/bit ratio, peering is not a big of a monetary beneift as it used to be. BAck when you only needed a DS3 to the naps for peering, and transit cost $1200 a megabit, peer

RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd)

2002-07-01 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
>From: Paul A Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Since this is basically a financial issue (and not really a regulatory >issue), the only way you could make it 'fair' is to have some kind of >mandate from a government body to MAKE peering 'fair'. The only way _I_ >would buy off on that, would be to ha

Re: If you were in a government Cyber-warning center

2002-04-27 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
>From: Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > C) How deep do you want it? ATT put their #5 TCC cable down 4'; > > no easy task. {But then, we paid for it...}. Will that help > > when a locomotive lands on it? If it doesn't... it's much harder > > to fix. > >The average locomotive is something above

RE: is your host or dhcp server sending dns dynamic updates for rfc1918?

2002-04-19 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
>From: Eric Germann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >If people set up their Win2K networks right, it wouldn't be a problem. >Simply install the MS DNS server, point their clients at that, then all the >updates go there. And if that DNS server has connectivity to the 'Net at >large, it will resolve all the

Re: NANOG costs

2002-04-10 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
>From Nanog web site: "Waiving the Registration Fee The NANOG registration fee is waived for: Speakers Employees of the hosting organization who are actively involved in meeting setup Full-time students in the local hosting city with current ID. The fee for all other full-time students is $

Re: NANOG costs

2002-04-10 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
I could have sworn that I looked this question up on Nanog's web page a year ago, but I couldn't find it there. The cost of the conference goes to a number of things: 1) 14 people on the Merit staff are involved in organizing the conference. I am sure that some of the monies goes to paying e

orbz screwup

2002-03-22 Thread Ukyo Kuonji
A mail server I run a mailing list on has just been receiving refused messages, with the servers claiming that the server has been found to be an open relay by orbz. Upon investigating, I noticed that the orbz site is missing any information on sites on the list, and how to get sites off the