.
- ---
true enough.
Or maybe I'm just missing the point of this thread.
- -
You might want to take a look at rfc 2804 for some background.
regards,
/virendra
Flounder
Vicky Rode wrote:
comments in-line:
Peter Dambier wrote:
Vicky Rode wrote:
...Raising
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
They could be possible rate-limiting it. That's why tools such as mtr
and others do not necessarily tell you the whole truth.
regards,
/virendra
Elijah Savage wrote:
Jon Lewis wrote:
I was trying to get some IOS and compare a few images in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
comments in-line:
Peter Dambier wrote:
Vicky Rode wrote:
...Raising my hand.
My question is on Terry Hartle's comments, maybe someone with more
insight into this could help clear my confusion.
Why would it require to replace every router
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/25/AR2005102501807.html
or
By Arshad Mohammed
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 26, 2005; Page D01
New federal wiretapping rules that would make it easier for law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just taking a quick poll to see if nanog community would consider this
a worthwhile effort to pursue?
regards,
/virendra
- Original Message
Subject: Re: FCC Outage Reports ..(.was Verizon outage in Southern
California?)
Date:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wonder what ever happened to redundancy? I guess 5 9s (dunno what the
going number is) got blown out of the water for them.
regards,
/virendra
David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apparently there was a software glitch in the switch(s) which disrupted
route calls.
regards,
/virendra
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matthew Black
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 3:13 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
well, if the existing discussion is not enough, cisco has an interesting
article out...see /. for more information.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_8-3/ipv4.html
wearing my flame suite :-)
regards,
/virendra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just trying to get some clarity and direction regarding obtaining
address space/ASN for my client.
Is there a minimum address space (?) an entity would need to justify to
go directly to RIR (ARIN in this case) as opposed to the upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has any links and /or price matrix for colos?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
this is a good start for me...i'll take it from here :-)
regards,
/vicky
Paul Vixie wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vicky Rode) writes:
|
|
|Just wondering if anyone has any links and /or price matrix for colos?
|
|Any pointers will be appreciated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone (a) experienced or noticed issues related to this
vulnerability (b) what action(s) have you taken to address this, if any?
What do folks at verisign and isc think about this?
Any insight will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
Fergie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Did anyone catch this? Has anyone experienced any issues and if so, what
steps did you take to address this?
http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2005/05/05/much-controversy-over-googles-accelerator/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
comments in-line:
Dan Hollis wrote:
| On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
|
|to source is still the big gap. imiho, from the ops perspective,
|only sally's ecn has made any useful approach. sadly, we may be
|able to judge the actual demand for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Just wondering how's internet2 community/partners protecting themselves
from lawsuits of illegal use of music/movie downloads.
In general, how are they protecting themselves from malicious code
infection spreading at internet2 speed? How are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I made that up :-)
Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
regards,
/vicky
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
| On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
|
|
|In general, how are they protecting themselves from malicious code
|infection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
since you deviated from my original post...
http://www.icir.org/floyd/ccmeasure.html
regards,
/vicky
Daniel Roesen wrote:
| On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:07:15PM -0700, Vicky Rode wrote:
|
|Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian,
The ECN capable transport (ECT) bit would need to be set by the data
sender to indicate that the end-points of the transport protocol are
ECN-capable. The intermediate routers will need to honor these bits as well.
Fore more information,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/04/06/197203from=rss
Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind and if so
any feedback.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thanks for the insight to all who responded.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
You are not alone. I've had problems even as a member :-)
I'll try and ping someone there and see what I can do.
Feel free to contact me directly if need be.
regards,
/virendra
Mark Newton wrote:
| I need to talk to someone who can update the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It depends.
If your device(s) was part of the change management notification then
that's correct.
regards,
//virendra//
Luke Parrish wrote:
| Trying to get clarification on an issue.
|
| Maintenance/outage window is 2:00AM to 5:00AM, during the window
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why even bother responding. Just imagine frontbridge (using them an
example, I have no affiliation with them) responding to each and every
spam they block..something like 7 terrabytes of data per week or so. I
guess this is one way to justify for more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Just wondering if there is any way I could use a scanner (I have a home
grown script for this) that would go thru the DNS registries from some
public source, scan for keywords in the domain name.
Anything that is available only to ISP's and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Just wondering if there are any pool of public accessible (read-only)
snmp enabled devices that one can access for testing purposes (such as
snmpwalk, polling devices via oid/mib, graphing chart..etc)?
I'm looking for a pool of devices that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
in-line:
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
| Vicky Rode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|not sure if spiders falls under spam or ddos bracket when they
|repeatedly start hammering one's network. you could possible report to
|spamcop (*grin*) to get a quicker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
in-line:
Jared Mauch wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 06:26:15PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
|
|David Barak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|While it says that bogon filters change, and provides
|a URL to check it, what percentage of folks who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
not sure if spiders falls under spam or ddos bracket when they
repeatedly start hammering one's network. you could possible report to
spamcop (*grin*) to get a quicker response. spamcom hasn't been accurate
in some instances :-)
do you remember this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
in-line:
Jim Popovitch wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 12:09 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
|
|
|Maybe maintain a few 1U colo boxes (cheap!) in data centers on
|selected networks around the world, from where you want to measure
|reachablity .. run
Hi there,
I'm curious to know what tools (in traffic engineering arena) people use
in order to manage and verify their service assurance that they are
providing and / or receiving they think they are.
How do you know the policers are functioning correctly?
How do you know whether your service
interesting reading
http://mail.internet2.edu:8080/guest/archives/qbone-arch-dt/log200205/msg0.html
regards,
/vicky
Edward B. Dreger wrote:
GC Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 16:53:17 -0400
GC From: Gordon Cook
GC The point I am making in my report is NOT that the best
GC effort network has
I'm interested in hearing people's view points on this as well. In
general what do folks thing about implementing yet another appliance
within their networks as opposed to implementing the same features (if
supported by their gear vendor) within their choke points.
regards,
/vicky
Matt Bazan
Mailing list for QoS discussions has been created. This is multi-vendor
list accelerating the adoption of IP products and services that benefit
from QoS capabilities.
This list is intended to aid anyone deploying QoS solutions. Feel free
to spread the word.
Many thanks to Jared Mauch in
, 09 May 2004 21:36:41 -0700
From: Vicky Rode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: x
Subject: Hierarchical Credit-based Queuing (HCQ): QoS
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0
X-Enigmail
Hi there,
Say if I had a qos appliance installed on networks between a lan and a
wan box would the qos policies be carried across wan end points (point
to point connection)? In other words, will the router retain the TOS
bits across to the other side of the wan connection to provide QoS-style
the TOS bits set
by the host so in your case we would modify the TOS bits.
Scott C. McGrath
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Vicky Rode wrote:
Hi there,
Say if I had a qos appliance installed on networks between a lan and a
wan box would the qos policies be carried across wan
Hi there,
Just wondering if anyone out there has either implemented or looked into
this queuing method for quality of service implementation.
This solution is offered (hardware solution) and patented by
foursticks.com. According to foursticks, HCQ achieves the efficiency
and flexibility of
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
| Vicky Rode
| Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 9:57 PM
| To: David A. Ulevitch; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
|
|
| Hi David,
|
| i'm just couple feet away from my box. i'm currently using wireless
and
| even
| tried
Hi Jay,
comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 10:22 PM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
It would be easier to troubleshoot
howdy folks,
just wondering has anyone noticed http access issue (the page cannot be
displayed) on time warner network ? i literally have to try 5 to 6 times to
get to the page. i believe this problem just started a week or so back.
i've even talked to few other people on socal.rr.com network
Hi Jay,
see comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 4:09 PM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: has anyone notice this ?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
just wondering has anyone noticed
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David A. Ulevitch
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 6:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
quote who=Vicky Rode
vickyr i'm a time warner end-user trying to access outside world
which could be anything
42 matches
Mail list logo
