RE: is reverse dns required? (policy question)

2004-12-02 Thread cjosephes
> Quick example, though: of 6936 patterns currently in my list, if you > just run a cut on \\ (which catches either '.' or '-' as the > next char, > for the most part) you get (matches of 20 or more): > > count first left-hand pattern part > - > 1572 ^[0-9]+ >

RE: is reverse dns required? (policy question)

2004-12-01 Thread cjosephes
> Just a quick note: it's not a BCP yet, but it's also considered > /extremely/ friendly by mail admins and others, if you use a naming > convention for your rDNS that is easily placed into access.db > and other > "right-anchored" string matching mechanisms. e.g., if you have a > dynamically assi