And apologies for the html of the previous two posts :)
This is made easier by the cisco allowing regular expressions in the
extcommunity list,
an RT scoping policy can be implemented as a result.
David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Limited
http://www.clara.net
-Original Message
>On Wednesday 02 April 2008, David Freedman wrote:
> We have dedicated VPNv4 route reflectors, they work well
> for us.
>An inevitable end as the number of routes grows.
In our case we use the cisco "rr-group" directive
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/ipr
One other option we theorize would be to have dedicated
VPNv4 route reflectors (route reflectors that do not
reflect other address families, e.g., IPv4, IPv6, e.t.c.).
We have dedicated VPNv4 route reflectors, they work well for us.
Dave.
>1: Per my prior message, create a "SuperAS" that highly trusted entities
How do we qualify those, are they linked to the amount of revenue we would lose
from customers
if they can't reach them? Can I be one of those? :)
>2: Have some sort of algorithm that inversely relates AS number to longe
opular.htm)
"
which in turn points to [www|ftp].internic.net
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:25:52PM +,
David Freedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 114 lines which said:
Shame its not made it to HTTP yet:
Nothing to do with the
I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -+
| | Mike Leber Wholesale IPv4 and IPv6 Transit 510 580 4100 |
| | Hurricane Electric Web Hosting Colocation AS6939 |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://he.net |
| +----
>Why don't you just put your DNS servers in some other TLD and forget
>about the problems of adding glue records to .net/.com? The name
>of your DNS server can't really be that important.
Because it would mean changing the nameservers for $stupid amounts of customer
domains
for which we are
Jeroen has made a start:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/dns/?faq=ipv6glue
David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Limited
http://www.clara.net
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 1/24/2008 00:42
Will somebody please, please PLEASE let me know what magic process for
networksolutions are to get glue added, am on the 72nd hour of the
phone game where questions are bouncing between:
- What is a glue record?
and
- What is an record?
$ dig +norec @a.gtld-servers.net. dot
Have to say, using screenOS 5.4 on our juniper kit and relatively happy.
Elsewhere, if you just want a packet filter, v6 ACLs are fine, depending
of course whether they are done in hardware or software and if this is
appropriate for your application (i.e , ACL in software path is
perfectly ap
James R. Cutler wrote:
Cost of operating v4/v6 combined for some time includes, among other
things:
1. Help Desk calls resulting from confused customers wanting
configuration help.
2. Memory for Routing Information for IPv4 plus IPv6.
3. Help Desk calls resulting from errors by confused e
Neil J. McRae wrote:
I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters names.
/me awaits super-super-grover...
Its too late, you've already admitted that the data exists and can be
captured.
This is always where it starts...
Dave.
Leigh Porter wrote:
Alexander Harrowell wrote:
On 6/7/07, Leigh Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since only port 80 is passed through the filter then of course the
You may want to contact Fibernet (now a Global Crossing company), they
have some PoPs there with fiber and general connectivity.
We are also present there and can provide connectivity, but not co-location.
Dave.
Andrew Gristina wrote:
I have two racks in London UK. The colocation is
curre
I'm interested as to why RIRs dont set the minimum PI allocatable
to /24 in order to fit with the current trend.
I mean, I can see the reason for smaller allocations where an LIR routes
and aggregates both but these are rare and probably legacy examples.
Changing the allocation policy such th
Randy Bush wrote:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
286
134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45)
Origin IGP, localpref 100,
I have now spoken to somebody there,
many thanks to all those that replied.
Dave.
David Freedman wrote:
If you are one or know one, can you please contact me off-list.
Muchly Appreciated
--
David Freedman
Network Engineering Department
Claranet UK Limited
http://www.clara.net
If you are one or know one, can you please contact me off-list.
Muchly Appreciated
--
David Freedman
Network Engineering Department
Claranet UK Limited
http://www.clara.net
Well, since you are probably doing this either via the
"default-information originate" command, or via the "redistribute
static"
command, its always going to be an AS-EXTERNAL route (inter-area),
either type 1 or 2 (depending on what you configure as metric-type).
--
D
20 matches
Mail list logo