if you have ipv6 connectivity and are willing to volunteer
some (low bandwidth) v6 traceroute data to a good cause
(== a topology map of observed ipv6 connectivity), please
help us out for a few ( estimated < 15) min with:
http://www.caida.org/data/how-to/scamper/ipv6-collection-2007/
please s
[warning NOT operationally relevant, just need to clarify]
re
http://news.yahoo.com/photos/ss/events/ts/122805nsaspying/im:/060125/480/dcev10301252131;_ylt=Ag51RnYLYcMpHtd_Cq9ZJCNiWscF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3dmhrOGVvBHNlYwNzc20-
thanx to those who forwarded this, it was news to us. note that the
AScore
- Forwarded message from "Bill St.Arnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:27:53 -0500
From: "Bill St.Arnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CAnet - news] A new vision for the future of the Internet
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.66
but in the interest of full and early disclosure, etc
k
- Forwarded message from k claffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:34:27 -0800
From: k claffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Caida] yoshi's study on remote physical device fingerprinting
To:
perhaps more relevant to nanog-futures list but
i'll assume everyone cares.
k
- Forwarded message from Bob Braden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:50:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Braden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [e2e] ACM SIGCOMM 2005 Workshop on Mining Network D
On Thu, Jul 15 05:27:32 2004 From: Mikael Abrahamsson
Ethernet:
Peak almost twice upload as download.
Average is 2.5-3 times more upload than download.
ADSL 8M/800k:
Peak twice the amount download as upload
Average is 1.3-1.5 more download than u
using RouteViews data
http://www.caida.org/analysis/routing/astypes/
k
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:14:10PM -0700, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> I have a question regarding information on my ISP's peering relationships.
> Are the speeds of some or all peering relationships public knowledge, and if
> so, where can I find this? By speed, I mean bandwidth (
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 02:06:59AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, James Edwards wrote:
> http://www.cymru.com/DNS/gtlddns-o.html
>
my mrtg skillz are kind of lame, but this seems to show 2/3rds outage from
this monitoring point of view. It'd be nice i
rce
as well as destination of insights.
less operationally relevant, but for those who care about
what's afoot at CAIDA:
----- Forwarded message from k claffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:56:40 -0700
From: k claffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: recent
for those who don't speak inside-dc-beltway,
the below is a request for information that
a well-funded federal agency will use to write
a proposal solicitation, to which folks
(including but not limited to operators)
then write proposals to get ops research funding.
(and ultimately, presumabl
as already mentioned, fascinating public policy theatre
is going on in DC on the verisign wildcard issue, see
http://secsac.icann.org/
[all video and even transcripts of both meetings online. go icann.]
you are encouraged to read through all of it before making public comments
on this is
[ok last operationally irrelevant URL from me this month]
those with researchy dispositions might like the
(still young) annotated catalog of Internet research publications:
http://www.caida.org/outreach/bib/networking/
far from complete and
as always we welcome contributions
[also won't affect your router;
also involves a risk of learning something:]
in response to router vendors' request for analysis
AS breakdown into of transit vs stub, multi vs single homing,
using massive traceroute data as well as routeviews bgp data:
http://www.caida.org/analysis/
[disclaimer: this email will not affect any router config or
worm containment or verisign behavior, and please don't waste
your time reading unless you want to learn something about
v4/v6 address distribution by country]
bradley extended his IPv4 address resource geopolitical analysis
to IPv6
sent to e2e hoping thread pursued on only
one mailing list but wasn't sure which
one would hate it more. fwiw.
critical feedback/corrections/thoughts welcome
k
- Forwarded message from k claffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:26:30 -0800
From: k cla
[david not on nanog list so am forwarding for him]
- Forwarded message from David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:42:18 -0800
From: David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before
To: k cl
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:59:48AM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
davidmoore certainly thought it was cute when he saw it last nite:
david is impressed that deepsight was tracking the worm "hours before
it began propagating".
david says, "What, did the worm author call them up and tell them,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:45:39AM -0700, Stephen Stuart wrote:
Traceroute sends UDP datagrams and receives ICMP datagrams in order to
show you what it shows you. It is possible for the ICMP datagrams to
return via a different path than the UDP datagrams took outbound (it
is also possi
does anyone know of a concise genealogy of providers
since 1990
(e.g., GTE + BBN begat GTE Internetworking;
GTEI absorbed Genuity; GTE + BBN + Genuity + ... => Verizon;
by ASes even better but we can do the mappings if needed)
we're trying to integrate a little more semantic sanity
to pres
reasonable article on ddos taxonomy
if you haven't seen it
http://www.lasr.cs.ucla.edu/ddos/ucla_tech_report_020018.pdf
am sure jelena et al would be grateful
for any operationally flavored feedback
k
sorry about long latency
but andre did some analysis that's relevant to
joe's message during this nanog thread earlier this month.
include joe's message for context and andre's response below.
(andre's response relates to last paragraph of joe's message)
k
===
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:38:01PM -0800, Gironda, Andre wrote:
We probably get Qwest transit cheaper than you, and yes, it is the
cheapest in the industry. Not too bad considering Qwest is definitely
in the top ten largest Tier 1 providers, and probably even the 3rd or
4th largest
PROTECTED] for user account)
k
k claffy wrote:
> http://www.caida.org/projects/ipnmoo/
> telnet://ipnmoo.caida.org:4766/
> (note i moved it from www.caida.org:4766;
> i'll get the web page fixed tomorrow)
> k
as of about 6
google: ipnmoo
(it's not really hiding)
it's many years old,
and inspired by the spirit originally intended
by craig's ipn-list. (i.e., it wasn't kc's idea)
it's still supported (at the very least)
but i don't consider it a reasonable substitute
for the Right Way.
but then i don't see any
25 matches
Mail list logo
