RE: NANOG Changes

2005-02-21 Thread ren
. Embrace the progress made on many fronts and work towards the by-laws. -ren At 08:59 PM 2/20/2005 -0800, Michel Py wrote: Hi Gadi, Gadi Evron wrote: Please read the below text in full, if you are going to read any of it. I use a lot of cynicism to get my point across. Same here. Besides cynicism, I

Route analysis from today's AS9121 incident - preso in Seattle?

2004-12-24 Thread ren
with the understanding past requests for Renesys data presentations have been turned down by the program committee. The 'can't prefix filter peers' problem has to be solved. NANOG is the right forum for this topic. Sincerely, -ren

Oct. NANOG - hotel? At the two month marker now.

2004-08-17 Thread ren
Hi folks, Could someone with the hotel location data for the 17-19 Oct NANOG please email me? 'Reston, VA' got rejected as not specific enough for the travel authorization. http://www.nanog.org/ http://www.arin.net/ only list Reston, VA. Thanks, -ren

Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]

2004-07-03 Thread ren
syndrome? -ren

Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG

2004-03-15 Thread ren
Stop it children. The thousands of people on this mailing list do not need to watch this road kill. -ren At 06:11 PM 3/15/2004 +, John Harold wrote: Yes, Gregory Taylor aka OseK is a perfect gentlemen now. Here are logs from Feb 4th 2004 showing him being a perfect gentlemen... (08:35

Re: peer routing issue between SBC and SPRINT in DFW??

2003-11-26 Thread ren
is working, confirmed from three other peer networks. Enjoy your turkey day tomorrow! Cheers, -ren At 03:50 PM 11/26/2003 -0700, John Brown (CV) wrote: seems there is an issue with SPRINT and SBC out of DFW SBC NS's are unreachable... Sprint says there is no problem with their gw-39 router

Re: need a contact at Prodigy/Ameritech

2003-11-18 Thread ren
BTW, this has been redirected to Prodigy for assistance. Cheers, -ren, with 4 forwards of this note already G At 10:13 AM 11/18/2003 -0500, Mark Jeftovic wrote: If anyone at Prodigy/Ameritech in here can you contact me offlist or let us know what the listing critereon is for your BL? host mx1

Re: China Telecom filtering nameservers

2003-10-23 Thread ren
actually no. Joe can probably tell you more but they are peering at both Equinix-Los Angeles PAIX-Palo Alto in California in addition to the carrier hotel on One Wilshire. -ren At 04:28 AM 10/23/2003 -0700, Eric Kuhnke wrote: Gut instinct says that One Wilshire is their primary US PoP

hunting for ARIN election site posted at NANOG

2003-10-22 Thread ren
howdy - I wanted to vote for a few fine candidates but misplaced the URL Ray posted on Tuesday morning. Anyone have it handy? It was the one where you could include your NANOG registration info, not this one: http://ww1.arin.net/elections/votingbooth.html thank, -ren

Re: hunting for ARIN election site posted at NANOG

2003-10-22 Thread ren
Thanks! -ren At 01:31 PM 10/22/2003 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was this what you were looking for? http://onsite.arin.net Quoting ren [EMAIL PROTECTED]: howdy - I wanted to vote for a few fine candidates but misplaced the URL Ray posted on Tuesday morning. Anyone have it handy

consider fewer posts, more substance please...

2003-09-18 Thread ren
you post to avoid acting foolish in front of people you might someday have to ask for a job, an emergency response to a customer problem, rackspace, or peering. NANOG Committee Members, perhaps the addition of a per-day posting limit should be considered in the next round of FAQ updates? -ren

Re: Important changes to the .org tld today.

2003-09-05 Thread ren
c'mon Neil. Chill out. Rodney's posts have been 100% more content filled than your own. No need to fill mailboxes around the world with this crap. Especially not on a Friday. At 03:39 PM 9/5/2003 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote: For those of you who *will* have to troubleshoot inconsistent DNS

Re: But few companies say that they are as fully prepared as Equinix

2003-08-16 Thread ren
As an Equinix-Newark customer I can say the periodic informational update efforts were appreciated as well. Mission critical services never noticed the blip in their facilities. -ren At 03:43 PM 8/16/2003 -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: ATT reported 97 out of 100 generators worked

Re: Peering BOF VI at NANOG

2003-01-21 Thread ren
And for those attending the Gigabit Peering Forum in Los Angeles following NANOG, please drop me a line [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you can make the dinner out in Malibu at http://www.gladstones.com on the 12th. Cheers, -ren At 08:16 AM 1/10/2003 -0800, William B. Norton wrote: Hi all - If you

Re: PAIX

2002-11-18 Thread ren
Get over Netrail already Nathan. Enough years have passed... -ren At 08:48 AM 11/18/2002 -0800, you wrote: You should move to the Atlanta NAP. It is designed to withstand a plane crashing into the building. BTW, Netrail still owes me money. - Nathan Stratton On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Daniel

Fwd: Next NANOG meeting/stats

2002-11-15 Thread ren
Hi Susan, Is this date absolutely set in stone? First Halloween, now Valentine's Day... how is a girl supposed to toss a good party if you put everyone in airports for all the fun holidays? Geesh. -ren The next NANOG meeting will be held February 9-11, 2003, in Phoenix, Arizona, where

Re: disconnected autonomous systems

2002-11-13 Thread ren
ASN per LATA to abide by the Telco Act of 1996... SBC is rapidly shrinking the need down to a handful. 4 ASNs are in use at IXs today. Next year that should be cut in half. http://www.sbcbackbone.net/peering/ -ren At 03:14 PM 11/13/2002 -0600, Daniel Golding wrote: Actually, most

Re: AP IX locations

2002-09-26 Thread ren
://www.jpnap.net/english/index.html click on services, then traffic. Rising from zero to 8G in a year is pretty steep. -ren, always pulling Los Angeles G

Re: Sprint peering policy

2002-06-29 Thread ren
a former top 10 down a band. Adlex, while expensive, can help prove your theory is inaccurate. Adlex has paid for itself in just a matter of months from my perspective G -ren At 10:37 AM 6/29/2002 +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: Peering around only works if the networks the broadband provider wants

Re: How important is IM? was RE: How important is the PSTN

2002-06-25 Thread ren
PGP Corporate Desktop can help with ICQ if you are a Windows user. -ren, who prefers IRC At 12:24 PM 6/25/2002 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote: So my question for the group is, do chat programs (IM, IRC, yahoo) serve a substantial network support

Re: Interconnects

2002-05-17 Thread ren
. PAIX Equinix. Equinix-Ashburn, PAIX-Seattle, Equinix-Newark and Equinix-Dallas and others have seen participation grow with a diverse blend of traffic from cable operators, telcos and content providers. Tier-1 means what? Look for growing sources of traffic. Your mileage may vary, -ren At 11

Re: Interconnects

2002-05-17 Thread ren
That depends on your corporate needs for power, security, remote hands, etc. The extended services found at Equinix PAIX are very important for many networks. -ren At 08:00 AM 5/17/2002 -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote: What about NYIIX/6IIX? Being in Telehouse where there are no monthly fees

Re: NANOG 25 - Toronto - Any Questions?

2002-04-30 Thread ren
. We should be back to the conference hotel for geeking around dinner time. G Cheers, -ren On Sun, 28 April 2002, Randy Neals wrote Hi Folks, For those making travel arrangements and planning your time around NANOG25 in Toronto we have a web site with local details up and running