Hi,
We've been seeing this too, but it looks to have been fixed from here
(AS12703) as of about 2 minutes ago.
Regards,
Rich
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
We're seeing it too. Has AKAM lost any key talent that kept them
straight until a few weeks ago? Isn't this the second
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Jeff Kell wrote:
We're running 30 SVIs on a 3550-12 (only 10 active at the moment, we're
in a transition). It is an aggregation switch that feeds back via L3.
According to the documentation on the Cisco site:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/145.html
The 3550-12
Hi all,
We're looking at L3 switches which have decent L3 packet forwarding
performance (wirespeed if possible), a reasonable amount of L4 ACLs/ACEs
(an average of at least 80 per port) and comes in a 24-port 10/100 port
package with a couple of GBIC slots for uplinking to the core network.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, matthew zeier wrote:
I know this has been mentioned before, but other than NetBotz (too pricey),
what are people use as ethernet-based, SNMP-probable temp sensors?
http://www.jacarta.co.uk
Rich
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a similarly sized connection to MFN/AboveNet, which I won't
recommend at this time due to some very questionable null routing they're
doing (propogating routes to destinations, then bitbucketing traffic sent
to them) which is causing
Hi all,
I was just updating a couple of Windows machines and had been using
Windows Update without any problems until about 5 mins ago (22:10 GMT)
when I've started getting this:
Thank you for your interest in Windows Update
Windows Update is the online extension of Windows that helps you
It's just come back now. Must have been a temporary holding page while
they did some maintenance.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was just updating a couple of Windows machines and had been using
Windows Update without any problems until about 5 mins ago (22:10
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, St. Clair, James wrote:
Cars did not become more popular because owners had to learn how to swap
more parts.
The good ole computers as cars metaphor. In the UK:
1) In order to drive a car, you have to have a license.
2) In order to have the car on the road, you have
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, St. Clair, James wrote:
I've lived in the UK, and never had a license to maintain or update the
engine.
See point number 2:
2) In order to have the car on the road, you have to have it taxed and
have a qualified mechanic certify it for basic road worthiness.
The
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I recall one of our users was involved in a DoS once a few years back
when the giant pings could crash MS boxes. The fact that his perceived
anonymity was removed was enough to keep him from repeating his
attacks
That's the heart of the problem.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jared Mauch wrote:
I think you'll see more and more networks slowly over
time move closer to bcp38.
Is there anywhere that this is recorded? It would be interesting to see
what the actual state of play on implementation of BCP38 was.
I believe that ATT is the
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Dave Temkin wrote:
Is this really an issue? So long as they're not advertising the space I
see no issue with routing traffic through a 10. network as transit. If
you have no reason to reach their router directly (and after Cisco's last
exploit, I'd think no one would
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Mike wrote:
I have sent mail to every address @BT that looks like it might possess
clue, to no avail. This is a general plea for help- if anyone has an
idea of how I might resolve this, I would be very grateful...
Point the customer at www.traceroute.org?
HTH,
Rich
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, David Diaz wrote:
I think this is old news. There was a cover story back in 1996 time
frame on Mae_east. We have to ask how likely is this with many of
the top backbones doing private peering over local loops, how much
damage would occur if an exchange point where
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
We saw many hundred thousand packets per second entering our network
from various international peers, each packet was tcp destined to a
single real end user IP address and sourced from a /16 network address
eg 61.254.0.0, where the src was
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Chris Roberts wrote:
Yer, some dial providers that I've seen do it to make use of these
addresses, as x.x.x.0/32 is a perfectly valid host address.
I've seen this too. Dialup boxes that use dynamic pools prefer them to
start on a subnet boundry so that they can announce
Hi,
I've been following the discussion on DDoS attacks over the last few weeks
and our network has also recently been the target of a sustained DDoS
attack. I'm not alone in believing that source address filters are the
simplest way to prevent the types of DDoS traffic that we have all been
17 matches
Mail list logo
