Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]

2003-11-26 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:16:43PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > > > In a working transport system, what goes in must come out. So, if you add > > all the ports in a common direction (in or out), you'll at least get a > > nice aggregate even if you can't measure individual virtual circuits > >

Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]

2003-11-25 Thread Eric Osborne
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:16:43PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > > > > > In a working transport system, what goes in must come out. So, if you add > > all the ports in a common direction (in or out), you'll at least get a > > nice aggregate even if you can't measure individual virtual circuit

Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]

2003-11-25 Thread Alex Rubenstein
> In a working transport system, what goes in must come out. So, if you add > all the ports in a common direction (in or out), you'll at least get a > nice aggregate even if you can't measure individual virtual circuits > properly due to whatever brokeass vendor you're using. :) ... which does

Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]

2003-11-25 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:29:26PM -0500, joshua sahala wrote: > > Alex Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > we are still in the testing phases, but i believe that we are > > > planning to use a port+traffic billing scheme, if/when we go live > > > and start trying to sell it >

Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]

2003-11-25 Thread joshua sahala
Alex Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > we are still in the testing phases, but i believe that we are > > planning to use a port+traffic billing scheme, if/when we go live > > and start trying to sell it > > do you mean: > > $port + $traffic_through_port > > or: > >

RE: [RE: MPLS billing model]

2003-11-25 Thread Dan Lockwood
st (E-mail) ' Subject: Re: [RE: MPLS billing model] > we are still in the testing phases, but i believe that we are planning to > use a port+traffic billing scheme, if/when we go live and start trying to > sell it do you mean: $port + $traffic_through_port

Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]

2003-11-25 Thread Alex Rubenstein
> we are still in the testing phases, but i believe that we are planning to > use a port+traffic billing scheme, if/when we go live and start trying to > sell it do you mean: $port + $traffic_through_port or: $port + $traffic_over_vpn_tunnel I ask this, because, it's very p

Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]

2003-11-25 Thread joshua sahala
"St. Clair, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd appreciate knowing this as well - thanks in advance > > Jim > -Original Message- > From: Dan Lockwood > To: Nanog List (E-mail) > Sent: 11/25/2003 2:04 PM > Subject: MPLS billing model > > > For those of you who sell MPLS VPNs, wha