DJR> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:17:56 +0700
DJR> From: Dr. Jeffrey Race
DJR> Please read the details in the text. It is all spelt out
DJR> there.
I'm glad someone has spelt out how we can find our way out of the
spam maize. Hopefully the details are explained with sufficient
granularity, and w
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Dr. Jeffrey Race
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice
(please comment)
quote:
> Well-managed, ethical members of the internet industry already conduct
> thei
I actually see several problems with this:
1.) Near as I can tell, Emergent Structures are observed phenomena. They
are not tools for social engineering.
2.) You suggest pushing this at "appropriate bodies." Near as I know...
there is no such animal.
3.) You say in the header that you're look
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Dr. Jeffrey Race wrote:
> Whether it is implemented is not my business. I am the doctor
> diagnosing the illness and prescribing the scientifically validated
> cure, and warning the patient of the quack remedies on the market.
> My job is done now (almost, I just have to refo
McBurnett, Jim wrote:
> To be blunt:
> It seems that your opinion is: If a company wants to dump trash in
> my email account
> and they are able to find an ISP who is so blindly just taking a
> payment and cares less
> about what who they provide service to, so be it, I don't care.
I did not eve
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:05:31 -, Peter Galbavy wrote:
>quote:
>> Well-managed, ethical members of the internet industry already conduct
>> their businesses, successfully and profitably, according to the
>> principles specified in the Practice. The proposed Practice simply
>> aims to raise the en
quote:
> Well-managed, ethical members of the internet industry already conduct
> their businesses, successfully and profitably, according to the
> principles specified in the Practice. The proposed Practice simply
> aims to raise the entire industry to the level of today's best
> players.
I obj
Thank you Josh, please see inline comments which let me clarify points
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 13:17:35 -0500, Joshua Smith wrote:
>is there a forthcoming section on criterium for demonstrating reformation
>by the sp and/or 'offending' user?
The criterion is stated: no more complaints
>
>the pro
Thank you Andy for making my points so clearly. See inline
comments
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:30:11 -0500 (EST), Andy Dills wrote:
>Some comments, after reading the draft:
>>Under 2.1, Form of Practice, where you finally talk about what it is
>you're propsing:
>>"The withdrawal of IR (use of blockli
Some comments, after reading the draft:
Under 2.1, Form of Practice, where you finally talk about what it is
you're propsing:
"The withdrawal of IR (use of blocklists, cancellation of routing,
withdrawal of IP addresses and domain names) may in its early months of
adoption split the Internet in
10 matches
Mail list logo
