On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:56:07AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Correct. One of the few solutions you can do is setup connectivity (VPN
or so) of your own between them.
Oh excellent idea. Pushing traffic twice through the upstream pipes? I'm
sure the upstream ISPs will be very happy about such
Kevin Day wrote:
On Dec 21, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Kevin Day wrote:
[..]
The disincentives for a small-mid sized network to moving to IPv6 are pretty
big right
now, which means very few of us are going to do it willingly. (Remember,
the little guys are who are going to
However I'm much more concerned that big providers (anyone who can
qualify for a /32) need to make nearly zero changes to their way of
doing things, but MomPop's regional ISP or Chuck's Web Hosting and
Bait Shop are going to be losing out big when it comes to IPv6.
Which is preferable,
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter)
Sent: 22 Dec '05 03:55
The RIRs have not made any decisions yet about offering
geotop addresses, but 7/8 of the IPv6 address space has
been
Ok, I promise this is my last reply to the list about this... This
has gone too far into theoretical and not operational content, and
probably belongs on an IPv6 policy list, so I'll hush. :) I'll
follow up with anyone privately who wants to continue the discussion
though.
On Dec 22,
Kevin Day wrote:
[..]
I agree with your point that currently your IPv4-solution can't be
applied to IPv6 but..(see the helpful and nice thingy part at the end ;)
1) We've got separate POPs in different cities, with no dedicated
connectivity between them. They act as entirely independent
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:34:06PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
The issue with announcing say a /48 is though that networks which filter
will filter it out and will only reach you over the aggregate. Of course
that is their choice, just like yours is to try to announce the /48's in
IPv6, or
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:34:06PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
The issue with announcing say a /48 is though that networks which filter
will filter it out and will only reach you over the aggregate. Of course
that is their
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:43:58PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? Where are the limits of BGP? Can you show me any numbers?
You'd be the first. I'm not aware of any protocol inherent scaling
brickwalls like with other protocols where certain timing constraints
place limits (or
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:43:58PM -0600,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? Where are the limits of BGP? Can you show me any numbers?
You'd be the first. I'm not aware of any protocol inherent scaling
brickwalls like with other protocols where certain timing
constraints
place
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:11:17PM -0500, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Correct. And there you have minimum frame spacing requirements (IFG)
and (e.g. with 10Base2 networks) minimum distance between stations
attached to the bus to allow CSMA/CD work correctly.
Interframe gap has no dependancy
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Really? Where are the limits of BGP? Can you show me any numbers?
You'd be the first. I'm not aware of any protocol inherent scaling
brickwalls like with other protocols where certain timing constraints
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Last time I checked, Ethernet is still CSMA/CD.
Ok, sure, half-duplex. People using auto-neg.
Only if you're running half-duplex, which is generally an
error condition in
modern networks.
Woops. This is the URL I meant to preface the comment with:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=oi=defmoredefl=enq=define:Interframe+gap
-M
On Dec 21, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:Kevin Day wrote:[..]I agree with your point that currently your IPv4-solution can't beapplied to IPv6 but..(see the helpful and nice thingy part at the end ;)Thanks. I also just want to add that I'm not expecting to be able to do every single thing
15 matches
Mail list logo
