I think a backup and level-set is in order... The original comment that
started this discussion was talking about ONLY signing allocations down
from IANA->RIR->LIR->EndSite, only in the whois system and NOT for use in
routing devices.
The papers/preso's that Sandy pointed to all talk only about u
On 24-Apr-2007, at 11:51, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can anybody be sure that the random peering tech they are
talking
to really works for the organisation listed in the whois record? By
visual inspection of the e-mail address?
Do people really talk to random peering techs? I thought tha
> How can anybody be sure that the random peering tech they are
> talking
> to really works for the organisation listed in the whois record? By
> visual inspection of the e-mail address?
Do people really talk to random peering techs? I thought that peering
contacts were all set up via face-t
On 24-Apr-2007, at 10:15, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might try taking a look at the various presentations at
NANOG/RIPE/ARIN/
APNIC/APRICOT about the whole idea. Central point: the
entity that gives
you a suballocation of its own address space signs something
that says you
now hold it.
> You might try taking a look at the various presentations at
> NANOG/RIPE/ARIN/
> APNIC/APRICOT about the whole idea. Central point: the
> entity that gives
> you a suballocation of its own address space signs something
> that says you
> now hold it.
If the whois directories actually operate
