On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, just me wrote:
I second the recommendation for PowerDNS.
Dear Nanog,
My apologies for not reading down the thread and seeing that the OP
was looking for a way to *stop* using powerdns.
My apologies also for failing once again to sign my post with my full,
legal name,
I second the recommendation for PowerDNS. I built an anycasted, sql
backended instant-update DNS server platform for a registrar who was
interested in selling a "premium dns service" product. We looked long
and hard at bind+dlz as well as PDNS.
Both are great products, and the dev
probind2.sf.net
It is not Postgresql and DLZ, it generates zones using MySQL database.
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Haagsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micah McNelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01,
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:24, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> That is called PowerDNS with a bind-backend ;)
>
AFAIK PowerDNS is only able to use BIND zone files as a data back-end,
not a BIND DLZ database not to mention this will make PowerDNS the DNS
server instead of BIND, which is exactly what
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:17 +0100, Erik Haagsman wrote:
> And while we're on the subject...anyone know a reliable web-based admin
> front-end for BIND + DLZ + PostgreSQL...? Or does everybody just roll
> their own...?
That is called PowerDNS with a bind-backend ;)
Rolling your ow
And while we're on the subject...anyone know a reliable web-based admin
front-end for BIND + DLZ + PostgreSQL...? Or does everybody just roll
their own...?
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:17, Micah McNelly wrote:
> Nanog,
>
> Does anyone have information on performance numbers comparin
Nanog,
Does anyone have information on performance numbers comparing tinydns
vs. bind w/ dlz patch?
Hit me up off-list.
/m
