On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Thus spake Claydon, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep. There's plenty of fiber between the two buildings, so we may go that
route. Anyone know if there's any easy way to limit bandwidth on the
PA-POS-OC3 adapters?
PA-POS-OC3MM$6000/card
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stephen Sprunk
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Claydon, Tom
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control Question
Thus spake Claydon, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED
,
ken emery
bye,
ken emery
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stephen Sprunk
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Claydon, Tom
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control Question
Title: Bandwidth Control Question
Hello,
A customer of ours in the next building would like 6M of Internet bandwidth from us, so we would wire a DS3 between the two buildings for connectivity.
The question is: how to we control the amount of bandwidth that we give them? Could we use rate
Tom,
If you are using Cisco's on both ends, you can easily do:
interface SerialX/0
bandwidth 6144
ip address IP Address 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip proxy-arp
load-interval 30
dsu bandwidth 6144
no dsu remote accept
scramble
cablelength 450
Title: Bandwidth Control Question
Why not simply use configuration option Cisco gives
you to set your DS3 to 6 meg
dsu bandwidth X
Dan, your suggestion will unncessarily tax his
equipment.
Bryan
- Original Message -
From:
Dan Ellis
To: Claydon, Tom ; [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bryan Heitman
Why not simply use configuration option Cisco gives
you to set your DS3 to 6 meg dsu bandwidth X
That's what I do, works fine.
Dan, your suggestion will unncessarily tax his equipment.
Not only that, but the rate-limiting on the input interface will likely force the
The only way to predict the future is to invent it.
--Alan Kay
-Original Message-
From: Michel Py [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Bryan Heitman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bandwidth Control
Title: RE: Bandwidth Control Question
Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in a PA-MC-2T3+ card for the 7206...I have at least four PA-MC-T3 cards, and they're not going to work the way I want them to (unless I rate-limit them).
Thanks,
= TC
--
Tom
Title: Bandwidth Control Question
Why
waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close. Don't overlook
the benefit of using the old thin-net for 200m.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Claydon,
TomSent: Friday, December 19, 2003 7
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in
a PA-MC-2T3+ card for the 7206...I have at least four PA-MC-T3 cards, and
they're not going to work the way I want them to (unless I rate-limit them).
This
Hi Mark,
Yes, it's a point-to-point link.
= TC
-Original Message-
From: Mark E. Mallett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Claydon, Tom
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control Question
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600
Roy wrote:
Why waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close. Don't
overlook the benefit of using the old thin-net for 200m.
I'd be cautious about metal between buildings, but Ethernet on
fiber might make sense.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:35:34AM -0500, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in
a PA-MC-2T3+ card for the 7206...I have at least four PA-MC-T3 cards, and
they're not
Title: Message
Or
wireless.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
RoySent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:30 AMTo:
Claydon, Tom; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Bandwidth Control
Question
Why
waste a T3 port. Run ethernet
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:36:08AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
Hi Mark,
Yes, it's a point-to-point link.
Somebody else mentioned ethernet; I know (without specific
recommendation though) that you can run fiber and use some inexpensive
media converters on each end to produce something that
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Roy wrote:
Why waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close. Don't
overlook the benefit of using the old thin-net for 200m.
I'd be cautious about metal between buildings, but Ethernet on
fiber might make
]
Subject: RE: Bandwidth Control Question
Why waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close.
Don't overlook the benefit of using the old thin-net for 200m.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:45:08AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:35:34AM -0500, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in
a PA-MC-2T3+ card for
Once upon a time, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The PA-MC-2T3+ will do both channelized and unchannelized
DS3 with the same PA.
This makes it easier on some of us who need both and for
doing sparing of hardware. It's worthwhile to spend the extra cash
if you think you're
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Bandwidth Control
Question
Or
wireless.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
RoySent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:30 AMTo:
Claydon, Tom
]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control Question
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Roy wrote:
Why waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close. Don't
overlook the benefit of using the old thin
The quite annoying thing about that is switching a PC-MC-2T3+ interface
from channelized (the default) to unchannelized causes a cbus complex
restart, which interrupts traffic through the router for a period of
time (the time varies based on the number of interfaces in the router).
Even with
Thus spake Claydon, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep. There's plenty of fiber between the two buildings, so we may go that
route. Anyone know if there's any easy way to limit bandwidth on the
PA-POS-OC3 adapters?
PA-POS-OC3MM$6000/card$38.71/Mbit
PA-FE-FX$3200/card$32.00/Mbit
PA-2FE-FX$5000/card$25.00/Mbit
$2,000 on ebay
randy
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control Question
PA-2FE-FX$5000/card$25.00/Mbit
$2,000 on ebay
randy
Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay? No one send you a box of rocks?
I've had 100% success buying on eBay. The Cisco TAC issue has never come up;
they NEVER ask me where I got something. Of course, the only hardware that has
ever failed on us has been exactly one Catalyst 2924 switch,
Fisher, Shawn
Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay?
No one send you a box of rocks?
That's the question the UPS driver once asked when delivering a 7507;
the box did contain a router though and no rocks.
What about Cisco SPAR for TAC support?
For some, it has come to a point where
: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control Question
Thus spake Claydon, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep. There's plenty of fiber between the two buildings, so we may go that
route. Anyone know if there's any easy way to limit bandwidth on the
PA-POS-OC3 adapters?
PA
Interestingly enough, sometimes it's cheaper to buy a small unmanaged switch
with a fiber uplink port than to buy a
media converter...
-Original Message-
Media converters are much cheaper than specialized FX cards
like these. A
10Mbps converters are just $99 each and
Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay?
yep. use rating system
No one send you a box of rocks?
nope
What about Cisco SPAR for TAC support?
new cisco parts
randy
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
PA-2FE-FX$5000/card$25.00/Mbit
$2,000 on ebay
And for the 7500s, you can get POSIP full cards for $250-$1000 depending
on fiber type, also from ebay.
--
Jon Lewis [EMAIL
R Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:05:55 -0800
R From: Roy
(CC list trimmed)
R Media converters are much cheaper than specialized FX cards
R like these. A 10Mbps converters are just $99 each and 100Mbps
R is $150.
Definitely more attractive than the work needed to prevent ground
loops when using
33 matches
Mail list logo
