-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
lynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for your lengthy letter- it's just the kind of letter we need -
> complete with specific cases so that we can go and investigate and
> terminate any individual cases that might not be terminated yet.
Three days la
ion in the spamming business.
Also there is quite an apparent proof, see the other list managers
that you really don't give a cents worth about anything related to
being something in handling abuse and making you a good netizen.
> Lynn Hoover
> CalPOP.com, Inc.
> 213-627-1937
> [EMAIL PR
CalPoP's owners/management are knowingly facilitating this behaviour. I
know, since I (thankfully very briefly) was retained as their CTO and
explicitly raised the spam issue as soon as I became aware of it. I personally
saw machines which appeared to be running software designed to attempt to pr
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:29:17PM -0400, Kai Schlichting wrote:
> On 9/3/2003 at 8:17 PM, "Jeroen Massar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As people are complaining all around about ISP's,
> > here is my small question. Who has a _working_ contact at
> > "CalPOP" (216.240.128.0/19 and others). It
On 9/3/2003 at 8:17 PM, "Jeroen Massar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> As people are complaining all around about ISP's,
> here is my small question. Who has a _working_ contact at
> "CalPOP" (216.240.128.0/19 and others). It is not in puck :(
> If anybody ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
As people are complaining all around about ISP's,
here is my small question. Who has a _working_ contact at
"CalPOP" (216.240.128.0/19 and others). It is not in puck :(
If anybody has a working one please mail it me offlist so
that the following long version of
