Pendergrass, Greg wrote:
>
Well, they already eat into your profits.
In Nibbles, or in Bytes ?
:P
-Original Message-
From: Wayne E. Bouchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 22:34
To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabi
Well, they already eat into your profits.
-Original Message-
From: Wayne E. Bouchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 22:34
To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
Does this mean our routers will be edible? :-)
On Fri
It gives number crunching an entirely new meaning.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 19:09
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
>
> Incorrectly
hey joe,
> If randy can tell me how to preemptively configure filter recognition
> for 'chitchat', then I'll send him some cookies. No points for
> reactive, since that is the present mode.
if we could clearly define email classification algorithms, with
negligible alpha and beta error bounds
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:09:12AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
>
> >
> >Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> >indigestion.
> >
>
> Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
. o O ( aka diarrhea? )
-
Does this mean our routers will be edible? :-)
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:45:17PM +, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
>
> Priceless. ;-)
>
> The Register:
> Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
>
> "Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
> with an unlikely mega-acquisit
> and nanog-linkexchange :-) Sometimes I think people post links so
> they can incite flame wars without actually looking like a flame war
> participant.
and i think they do it because they don't know how to set up their
own blog so they can tell the grandkids what they read today.
randy
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:02:06 -0500
Joe Provo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have as much humour as the next guy, but [insert renewed call for
> nanog-chat or nanog-social or whatever would keep the chitchat in a
> different blasted bucket]. Heck, if this is the general bucket than
and nanog-li
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:02:06PM -0500, Joe Provo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> > ...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
> > foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
> > little more backbone in
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:33:16AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
> 'Network devices are rated by total packet volume, not chassis weight.
> Packets may settle during shipping.'
No, Bill, that's the VoIP thread. Pay attention.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Bill Nash wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
> >
> > Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> > indigestion.
>
> Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
Yes, but this is only available with the Gastric Bypass fe
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> ...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
> foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
> little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
> reading about cr
They don't already?
-ejay
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Church, Chuck
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:54 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
> Incorrect
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Bill Woodcock wrote:
...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
reading about crackers until this time next year.
"In
> ...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
> foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
> little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
> reading about crackers until this time next year.
fix your mail reader's filters,
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 13:19:44 2005
> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:18:38 +0100
> From: Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:55 -0800
> "Dave Hilton" &
You mean SNACK engineers, right?
- Andy
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:35:11 -0600
> From: "Church, Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
> Yes. According t
...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
reading about crackers until this time next year.
-Bill
CTED]
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-Original Message-
From: Bill Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:09 PM
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chu
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Steve Sobol wrote:
>
> "Church, Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> > indigestion.
>
> I wonder how they're going to integrate Chips Ahoy into the existing Cisco
> lineup. Nabisco always used to advert
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:55 -0800
"Dave Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Must we now redefine "nibbles" & "bytes".
Well, I guess remote configs will have to be disabled - from now on the
only permitted access will be via the cereal port ...
Richard
"Church, Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> indigestion.
I wonder how they're going to integrate Chips Ahoy into the existing Cisco
lineup. Nabisco always used to advertise that Chips Ahoy has far more chips
than any of the
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:15:55 PST, Dave Hilton said:
>
> Must we now redefine "nibbles" & "bytes".
>
Read RFC4042 - they've just been increased 12.5%. Supersize-me! :)
pgpQxtmI8nUVh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Resellers beware-
New distribution channels will be opened up,
Girl Scouts will soon be seen offering
byte-able cookies in blue-green boxes,
door to door and in unlikely places!
Stale inventory is not expected to become
a problem even with the increased distribution.
Must we now redefine "nibbles" & "bytes".
At 01:09 PM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
That would be really bad! You would almost immediately gain 300lbs if you
enabled
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dave Hilton
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:44 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 11:30:15 2005
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:33:16 -0800 (PST)
> From: Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Robert Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
>
Runts are hereinafter referred to as crumbs.
Hilton
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
Brilliant move Cisco! This should give Cisco a keen and unprecedented insight
into the inner workings of the cracker culture which will enable better
network security.
'Network devices are rated by total packet volume, not chassis weight.
Packets may sett
At 11:45 AM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
Priceless. ;-)
The Register:
Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
"Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
with an unlikely mega-acquisition that will see Cisco
buy Kraft's Nabisco unit for $15bn. Perhaps even more
surprising, former RJR Nabisco a
Priceless. ;-)
The Register:
Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
"Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
with an unlikely mega-acquisition that will see Cisco
buy Kraft's Nabisco unit for $15bn. Perhaps even more
surprising, former RJR Nabisco and IBM CEO Lou Gerstner
has c
33 matches
Mail list logo
