On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:27:01PM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
>
> That's what I meant, thanks for rephrasing. $10M a year is definitely
> something that any size company will try to save; I remember posting
> here not that long ago that a $500k line card is definitely something I
> do not buy withou
>>> Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>>> "The popularity of file-sharing is costing the largest
>>> Internet service providers $10 million per year each
>>> in bandwidth and network maintenance costs, CacheLogic
>>> said."
>> Michel Py wrote:
>> $10 million a year for the largest ISPs is a drop in t
On Jul 15, 2004, at 12:36 AM, Michel Py wrote:
Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
"The popularity of file-sharing is costing the largest
Internet service providers $10 million per year each
in bandwidth and network maintenance costs, CacheLogic
said."
$10 million a year for the largest ISPs is a drop in the se
> Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
> "The popularity of file-sharing is costing the largest
> Internet service providers $10 million per year each
> in bandwidth and network maintenance costs, CacheLogic
> said."
$10 million a year for the largest ISPs is a drop in the sea; _if_ the
figure is accurate (sou
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
I was wondering if the NANOG readership-at-large had any experiences
in this regard, concerning any of these statements, since I couldn't
find anything of any real technical substance on CacheLogic's web
page.
If your aggregate traffic is for example 10Gbps and you
This is an interesting article -- not necessarily off-topic, given
snippets such as:
"The popularity of file-sharing is costing the largest Internet
service providers $10 million per year each in bandwidth and network
maintenance costs, CacheLogic said."
and
"It estimates Internet users
