http://www.cidr-report.org/#General_Status
+2500 last night. It seems that the origin of this disease is in France.
... quoting myself:
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:04:06 +0100
From: Fredy Kuenzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Init Seven AG - http://www.init7.net/
Subject: Routing Table Jump
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:51:33 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler said:
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
3263 0-3263 AS4151USDA-1 - USDA
so I wonder what's wrong with them.
I'm not sure which is more weird - a jump of over 3K routes,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:42:04PM +0200, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:51:33 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler said:
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
3263 0-3263 AS4151USDA-1 - USDA
so I wonder what's wrong with
Just to make it clear: AS4151 was 9 month ago. Now we see history again
with new actors. (I guess the actual increase was done by various ASN of
RENATER).
I'm curious how you reach the conclusion that RENATER has contributed
to many of the prefixes over the last week. They do seem to have
-- Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:42:04PM +0200, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:51:33 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler said:
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
3263 0-3263 AS4151USDA-1
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Fergie wrote:
to be good actors. Perhaps it's time to bring back the old /19
filters that were started by sprint such.
I was just thinking the same thing. :-)
Maybe with a central feed ala the bogons, where those clueful enough can
get their smaller blocks punched
Rob Evans schrieb:
Just to make it clear: AS4151 was 9 month ago. Now we see history
again with new actors. (I guess the actual increase was done by
various ASN of RENATER).
I'm curious how you reach the conclusion that RENATER has contributed
to many of the prefixes over the last week.
On 21-Jul-2006, at 09:17, Rob Evans wrote:
There seem to be a whole load of ASNs that have deaggregated. AS5416,
AS5639, AS6140, AS9121, AS13049, AS16130, AS17849, AS18049 (that's as
far as I got before getting bored). Some of these are advertising the
covering prefix too, so they're
On 21-Jul-2006, at 10:48, Joe Abley wrote:
It would help immensely with getting that document published if
people could read that draft, and let me know if it looks like
something they would implement if it was implemented. Private mail
would be great.
Uh, something they would deploy
On (2006-07-21 10:48 -0400), Joe Abley wrote:
As it happens, Tony Li, Rex Fernando and I wrote up a proposal for a
new attribute which might help in some of these situations. (It's a
crude mechanism, but not as crude as NO_EXPORT).
On 21-Jul-2006, at 11:20, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2006-07-21 10:48 -0400), Joe Abley wrote:
As it happens, Tony Li, Rex Fernando and I wrote up a proposal for a
new attribute which might help in some of these situations. (It's a
crude mechanism, but not as crude as NO_EXPORT).
On (2006-07-21 11:38 -0400), Joe Abley wrote:
That seems to me like another perfectly valid approach, and one that
already exists to some extent (e.g. by pre-poisoning AS_PATH
attributes with AS numbers of remote networks that you don't want to
accept particular routes). I'm told that
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Fergie wrote:
It's not, people are just lazy and since nobody owns the internet
man, or maybe it's all a bunch of tubes there's nobody to force people
to be good actors. Perhaps it's time to bring back the old /19
filters that were started by sprint such.
I was
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:59:35 EDT, Jon Lewis said:
As we push closer to the ipv4 route table limits of cisco's 6500/7600
series (with anything less than Sup720-3bxl), I suspect lots of networks
are going to be forced to start doing some sort of filtering of routes
beyond just refusing
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The big question is, of course, whether to upgrade a 6500 and keep it on
life support, or bite the bullet and go for a whole new box. How much time
a -3bxl and careful filtering will buy you does depend heavily on where in
the Internet you are -
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 01:59:35PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
As we push closer to the ipv4 route table limits of cisco's 6500/7600
series (with anything less than Sup720-3bxl), I suspect lots of networks
are going to be forced to start doing some sort of filtering of routes
beyond just
16 matches
Mail list logo
