On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:09:22PM -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> It should be pointed put that the ISPs have their share of blame for the
> quick-spreading worms, beause they neglected very simple precautions --
> such as giving cutomers pre-configured routers or DSL/cable modems with
> firewalls
Vadim Antonov wrote:
It should be pointed put that the ISPs have their share of blame for the
quick-spreading worms, beause they neglected very simple precautions --
such as giving cutomers pre-configured routers or DSL/cable modems with
firewalls disabled by default (instead of the standard "end-
It should be pointed put that the ISPs have their share of blame for the
quick-spreading worms, beause they neglected very simple precautions --
such as giving cutomers pre-configured routers or DSL/cable modems with
firewalls disabled by default (instead of the standard "end-user, let only
outgo
At 01:57 PM 28/08/2003 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> The majority comply and are understanding.
and the rest?
There will always be troublesome customers, but the VAST majority have been
compliant. If they dont want to comply to something as reasonable as this,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> The majority comply and are understanding.
and the rest?
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
We have been doing that. During quiet times our Customer Service Reps
(CSR) are calling infected users telling them
a) Their computer has been compromised. In its current state it can
potentially be taken over by others or other users can look at the contents
of their private files etc.
b) I
