Re: Cogent Dep(3)(3)ring

2005-10-05 Thread Adam Rothschild
On 2005-10-05-05:57:09, Adam Rothschild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cogent and Level(3) appear to be fully partitioned as of 5:50AM EST. On a related note, I've got some Juniper boxes with P-TUNNELs, and spare transit capacity to both (3) and Cogent. If anybody in the community is suffering fro

Cogent Dep(3)(3)ring

2005-10-05 Thread Adam Rothschild
Cogent and Level(3) appear to be fully partitioned as of 5:50AM EST. You heard it here first. :) Let the games begin... -a

Re: Dep(3)(3)ring

2005-09-28 Thread Phil Rosenthal
For what it's worth, I'm seeing the following: >show ip bgp 65.106.2.1 BGP routing table entry for 65.104.0.0/14, version 91507552 Paths: (6 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to update-groups: 1 2 3356 2828 4.78.164.109 from 4.78.164.109 (4.68.1

Re: Dep(3)(3)ring

2005-09-27 Thread Alex Rubenstein
Appears to be. XO's looking glass for BGP looking is broken (did it break today?), however, traceroute shows: 1 ge5-3-0d4.RAR2.NYC-NY.us.xo.net (65.106.2.1) 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec 2 * * * L3's looking glass: Show Level 3 (San Jose, CA) BGP routes for 207.155.252.78 No matching routes fo

Dep(3)(3)ring

2005-09-27 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
Since it hasn't hit nanog yet, I guess I'll go ahead and go ahead and be the first to point it out. It seems that Level 3 (3356) and XO (2828) are no longer carrying each other's routes. :) And just when I was about to release http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras/failure.jpg :) -- Richard A Steenberg