Have to admit to being surprised at DENIC poor placing.
The only time I did a comparison, DENIC were by far and away the best European
TLD maintainers.
Okay there wasn't much competition, and I was looking at purely technical
aspects of how the TLD were arranged, but the results were so good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Roesen) wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:48:51PM +0200, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
The other: ICMP has been rate-limited. It might not be the way to
test those locations. An mtr output would be more interesting :)
mtr uses ICMP too.
Yes, but it also shows where
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) wrote:
a.nic.de, 100 packets, 7% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 163.454/199.368/494.708 ms
c.de.net, 100 packets, 2% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 15.071/46.131/724.957 ms
z.nic.de, 100 packets, 3% packet loss
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:48:51PM +0200, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
The other: ICMP has been rate-limited. It might not be the way to
test those locations. An mtr output would be more interesting :)
mtr uses ICMP too.
Regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Florian Weimer) wrote:
As always: Never trust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...
I doubt that DENIC will ever publish the technical part of its bid, so
this isn't convincing.
Like you already admitted on the DENIC list, this has of course been made
public,
* Bill Woodcock:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared
apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's
200 ms (or what the actual numbers where).
Yeah, I was a little curious
a.nic.de is with RIPE in Amsterdam
f.nic.de and z.nic.de are in Frankfurt
c.de.net. is with Savvis in Santa Clara
s.de.net is with Deutsche Telekom in Germany
l.de.net I see over Mediaways/Telefonica DE in London (what a poor
choice, scary)
For what it's worth, a highly
That's milder than the critique offered by SWITCH in the last round.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
The Register article:
The report that this week decided the ownership of
the second most important directory on the Internet
has been called into question with the claim that a
fundamental element of it is factually incorrect.
* The Register article:
The report that this week decided the ownership of
the second most important directory on the Internet
has been called into question with the claim that a
fundamental element of it is factually incorrect.
Apparently, the main criticism is that DENIC developed the
Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan ...
funny, the first item of work email i read today was this:
the Neulevel SRS is currently down, .biz registrations are
therefore not possible.
We will inform you as soon as the registry is online again.
your metric
On 31.03.2005 22:36 Florian Weimer wrote
Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan or Verisign in many
aspects, so it's a non-issue in the end.
But only if you judge according to Telcordia's metric. As always: Never
trust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...
Arnold
--
Arnold
* Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine:
Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan ...
funny, the first item of work email i read today was this:
the Neulevel SRS is currently down, .biz registrations are
therefore not possible.
We will inform you as soon as
* Arnold Nipper:
On 31.03.2005 22:36 Florian Weimer wrote
Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan or Verisign in many
aspects, so it's a non-issue in the end.
But only if you judge according to Telcordia's metric.
Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia
The report that this week decided the ownership of the second most
important directory on the Internet has been called into question with
the claim that a fundamental element of it is factually incorrect.
can it BE? is this game RIGGED? what a SHOCKING SURPRISE! (not.)
based strictly
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared
apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's
200 ms (or what the actual numbers where).
Yeah, I was a little curious about the composition of
The report that this week decided the ownership of
the second most important directory on the Internet
has been called into question with the claim that a
fundamental element of it is factually incorrect.
Apparently, the main criticism is that DENIC developed the core of its
operations (the
On Thu, 31 March 2005 14:42:34 -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared
apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's
200 ms (or what the actual numbers
18 matches
Mail list logo
