OK, so was ANYONE on NANOG happy with
a) Verisign's site finder
b) How they launched it
Speak up on or off list.
---Mike
At 04:14 PM 03/10/2003, George Bakos wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:59:49 -1000 (HST)
Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VeriSign also angered the close-knit
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:23:29PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
OK, so was ANYONE on NANOG happy with
a) Verisign's site finder
Unfair competition, more confusions, broke a lot of stuff, etc, etc , beneficial to
nobody
b) How they launched it
Here... let's change the way DNS works..
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
:: OK, so was ANYONE on NANOG happy with
:: a) Verisign's site finder
:: b) How they launched it
::
Disregarding their implementation issues, the product is pretty good.
I've actually used it to fix a few typos, etc... From an end user
perspective, it's
jeffrey.arnold wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
:: OK, so was ANYONE on NANOG happy with
:: a) Verisign's site finder
:: b) How they launched it
::
Disregarding their implementation issues, the product is pretty good.
I've actually used it to fix a few typos, etc... From an end
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:34:05PM -0400, jeffrey.arnold quacked:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
:: OK, so was ANYONE on NANOG happy with
:: a) Verisign's site finder
:: b) How they launched it
::
Disregarding their implementation issues, the product is pretty good.
I've
