Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 11:49 PM 08-04-08 -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Martin Hannigan wrote:
You can purchase these things from sattelite image services these days
as well as get them from intelligence services.
Awesome, so could anyone buy a copy of the same images?
At 11:49 PM 08-04-08 -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Martin Hannigan wrote:
You can purchase these things from sattelite image services these days
as well as get them from intelligence services.
Awesome, so could anyone buy a copy of the same images? Which satellite
do you t
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Martin Hannigan wrote:
You can purchase these things from sattelite image services these days
as well as get them from intelligence services.
Awesome, so could anyone buy a copy of the same images? Which satellite
do you think happened to be taking images of the area with
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:31:47 -0400 (EDT)
Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Wow, civilian satellite images are getting very sharp.
>
> http://www.hindu.com/2008/04/07/stories/2008040759181200.htm
>
> Using satellite images of ship movements in the area, Reliance
> Globalcom identifi
, 2008 8:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Dubai impound ships suspected in cable damage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites.
I&#
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites. Any one of a
> number of affected or interested countries could have provided the imagery
> (or ship information) to Reliance. Its not saying *who* analyzed the i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites.
I'm glad you said it -- I was just about to utter the same. ;-)
- - ferg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
On Apr 8, 2008, at 7:57 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites. Any one
of a number of affected or interested countries could have provided
the imagery (or ship information) to Reliance. Its not saying *who*
analyzed the images. ;)
Then again
There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites. Any one of a
number of affected or interested countries could have provided the
imagery (or ship information) to Reliance. Its not saying *who* analyzed
the images. ;)
Then again, how are ship's captains supposed to know *where* the
Wow, civilian satellite images are getting very sharp.
http://www.hindu.com/2008/04/07/stories/2008040759181200.htm
Using satellite images of ship movements in the area, Reliance
Globalcom identified two ships in the area at the time which
may have damaged the cable.
Reliance also confirmed t
10 matches
Mail list logo
