* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henry Linneweh) [Thu 01 Jul 2004, 15:01 CEST]:
> Maybe Phil Zimmerman should come forth with new toys
> for big boys that will be more valient an effort than
> pgp with less a threat to his personal liberty.
You may not have been paying attention, but PGP Inc.'s _PGP Universe
> Can someone point out, please, that CPUs have kilometers of 'wires', ram
> have 'wires', and if anybody does any copying of data, its on the WIRES
> of the motherboard (or whatever applies) 'data (WIRE) BUS' ? :)
You should read the entire courts desicion, this issue is addressed. The
Wire T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Allen Simpson wrote:
| James Edwards wrote:
|
|>It seems to me all the court said is you cannot use the Wire Tap Act
|>in a case that the communication is not on the wire.
|
Can someone point out, please, that CPUs have kilometers of 'wires', ra
Hey Bill,
> Switches, routers, and any intermediate computers are fair game for
> warrantless wiretaps.
I looked at that and thought about the one-bit-delay in a ring, and
started playing with fragments and error correction and reassembly and
buffer size in the intermediate network element(s) a
James Edwards wrote:
>
> It seems to me all the court said is you cannot use the Wire Tap Act
> in a case that the communication is not on the wire.
That is, at any time (the phrase "seconds or mili-seconds" [sic]) that
the transmission is not actually on a wire.
Switches, routers, and any in
It seems to me all the court said is you cannot use the Wire Tap Act
in a case that the communication is not on the wire. The court did note
the they felt this Act needs updating. They indicated the Act was very specific
and they did not feel extending the Act to cover e-mail in the conditions ment
Maybe Phil Zimmerman should come forth with new toys
for big boys that will be more valient an effort than
pgp with less a threat to his personal liberty. We
definately need some relief from constantly being
criminalized enmasse for actions from citizens of
other
nations and from control freaks wh
I know Brad Councilman, This all happened in my back yard. He ran a
competing ISP with me (www.valinet.com). Not only was he reading his
customers e-mail and harvesting Amazon.com orders he also hacked into
4 of the local area ISPs. I still remember the day I received a call
from the FBI
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "John Neiberger" writes:
>
>http://wired.com/news/print/0,1294,64043,00.html
>
>Yet another reason why we should develop a system where all Internet
>communications can be easily encrypted, whether it's email, VoIP, or
>whatever. It's not like it's horribly difficu
http://wired.com/news/print/0,1294,64043,00.html
Yet another reason why we should develop a system where all Internet
communications can be easily encrypted, whether it's email, VoIP, or
whatever. It's not like it's horribly difficult now in some cases, but
it does have its difficulties when it
10 matches
Mail list logo
